e10vk
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended
March 31, 2006
Commission File No. 1-12984
EAGLE MATERIALS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State of Incorporation)
75-2520779
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
3811 Turtle Creek Blvd, Suite 1100, Dallas, Texas 75219
(Address of principal executive offices)
(214) 432-2000
(Registrants telephone number)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock (par value $.01 per share)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). YES o NO þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the Company at September
30, 2005 (the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter)
was approximately $2.107 billion.
As of
May 31, 2006, the number of outstanding shares of common stock was:
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding Shares |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value
|
|
50,406,400 |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Eagle Materials Inc.
to be held on July 27, 2006 are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Report.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
Eagle Materials Inc. (the Company or EXP which may be referred to as we or us) is a
manufacturer of basic building materials including gypsum wallboard, cement, gypsum and non-gypsum
paperboard and concrete and aggregates. We were founded in 1963 as a building materials subsidiary
of Centex Corporation (Centex). We operated as a public company under the name Centex
Construction Products, Inc. from April 1994 to January 30, 2004. Centex completed a tax free
distribution of its shares to its shareholders on January 30, 2004 (the Spin-off), and, as a
result, we are no longer affiliated with Centex. Today, our primary businesses are the manufacture
and distribution of gypsum wallboard and the manufacture and sale of cement. Gypsum wallboard is
distributed throughout the U.S. with particular emphasis in the geographic markets nearest to our
production facilities. We sell cement throughout the western U.S. and for the twentieth
consecutive year we have sold 100% of our cement production capacity. At March 31, 2006 we
operated four gypsum wallboard plants (five lines), four cement plants (six kilns, one of which
belongs to our joint venture company), one gypsum paperboard plant, eight concrete batching plants
and two aggregates facilities.
Calendar 2005 represented a record year for the building materials business:
|
|
|
A record high annual wallboard consumption of 36.2 billion square feet in
calendar 2005, 5.6% higher than calendar 2004; |
|
|
|
|
Cement consumption for calendar 2005, also a record high, grew by 5.7% to
139.1 million short tons, with imports continuing to make up more than 25% of U.S. supply; |
|
|
|
|
Pricing improvements were reflected in all of our sectors in calendar 2005 and
have been improving in the first four months of calendar 2006. |
Improving Productivity and Reducing Costs. We are constantly maintaining, evaluating and making
capital investments to improve the productivity and reduce the costs of our existing assets.
Collectively, this process resulted in the following fiscal 2006 achievements:
|
|
|
Record wallboard production and utilization; |
|
|
|
|
Cement plants operating at above rated design capacity and above industry average utilization; and |
|
|
|
|
A 15% increase in production over design capacity in our paperboard facility. |
Pursue Strategic Growth by Expansion or Acquisition Opportunities. Strategic growth opportunities
play a significant role at Eagle Materials. We continually focus on improving productivity and
reducing costs of our existing operations; however, we also remain focused on improving our
competitive position through expansion or acquisition. We look for opportunities that:
|
|
|
Are in our core businesses of wallboard and cement; |
|
|
|
|
Expand our geographic footprint; or |
|
|
|
|
Improve our position as a low cost manufacturer. |
During fiscal 2006, we began to actively pursue these strategic goals by:
Expanding our Wallboard Operations. On April 1, 2005, we announced the expansion of our wallboard
operations with the construction of a new $150 million wallboard plant in Georgetown, South
Carolina, which will utilize synthetic gypsum. The Company broke ground on the new facility in
March 2006 and anticipates it being completed and operational late in calendar year 2007.
1
Expanding on Our Existing Asset Position in Our Cement Business:
|
|
|
On January 10, 2005, we purchased the remaining 50% interest in the Illinois
Cement Company Joint Venture for $72 million, and on March 10, 2005 we announced a $65
million expansion of the plant which will increase clinker capacity 70% to 1.0 million
tons. The expansion is progressing as scheduled, and should be completed by December 2006
and fully operational by January 2007. |
|
|
|
|
On January 25, 2006, we announced plans to expand and modernize our Mountain
Cement Company plant and our Nevada Cement Company plant. The plans will expand the per
plant production capacity of Mountain Cement Company and Nevada Cement Company to 1.0
million tons of clinker annually representing an increase in production of 60% and 100%,
respectively. We anticipate investing a total of approximately $320 million for both
projects, and expect that both will be completed by and operational in the fall of 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Modernization and expansions of our cement plants will increase our total
clinker capacity by 50% to 4.0 million tons per year and our total cement capacity to
approximately 4.4 million tons per year by the end of calendar 2008. |
At Eagle our future is clear and straightforward: to remain a low cost producer in each of the
markets in which we compete by being disciplined and operationally focused. Our goal is to expand
our geographic footprint through acquisition or expansion that provides increased profitability for
our shareholders.
INDUSTRY SEGMENT INFORMATION
For management and financial reporting purposes, our businesses are separated into four
segments: Gypsum Wallboard; Cement; Recycled Paperboard; and Concrete and Aggregates. A
description of these business segments can be found on pages 4 - 14.
The following table presents revenues and earnings before interest and income taxes
contributed by each of our industry segments during the periods indicated. We conduct one of our
four cement plant operations through a joint venture, Texas Lehigh Cement Company LP, which is
located in Buda, Texas. The Company owns a 50% interest in the joint venture and accounts for its
interest using the equity method of accounting. However, for segment reporting purposes, we
proportionately consolidate our 50% share of the cement joint ventures revenues and operating
earnings, which is consistent with the way management organizes the segments within the Company for
making operating decisions and assessing performance. Prior to January 11, 2005, we reported our
50% interest in the Illinois Cement Company consistent with that of Texas Lehigh Cement Company.
Consequently, the information presented below and for the remainder of this Form 10-K includes the
50% interest in Illinois Cement through January 10, 2005 (the date we acquired the other 50%) and
our 100% interest in Illinois Cement for the period from January 11, 2005 through March 31, 2005,
and for all of fiscal 2006. Identifiable assets, depreciation, depletion and amortization, and
capital expenditures by segment are presented in Note (H) of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements on pages 52 - 55.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
479.1 |
|
|
$ |
350.1 |
|
|
$ |
272.9 |
|
Cement |
|
|
285.3 |
|
|
|
211.3 |
|
|
|
181.9 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
133.5 |
|
|
|
125.2 |
|
|
|
112.4 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
89.8 |
|
|
|
70.8 |
|
|
|
63.1 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
990.0 |
|
|
|
757.6 |
|
|
|
632.5 |
|
Less: Intersegment Revenues |
|
|
(65.1 |
) |
|
|
(58.8 |
) |
|
|
(53.6 |
) |
Less: Joint Ventures Revenues |
|
|
(65.2 |
) |
|
|
(82.3 |
) |
|
|
(76.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenues |
|
$ |
859.7 |
|
|
$ |
616.5 |
|
|
$ |
502.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Operating Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
154.2 |
|
|
$ |
81.6 |
|
|
$ |
35.6 |
|
Cement |
|
|
78.3 |
|
|
|
57.6 |
|
|
|
50.5 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
263.7 |
|
|
|
171.6 |
|
|
|
115.2 |
|
Corporate Overhead |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Interest and Income Taxes |
|
$ |
247.3 |
|
|
$ |
161.3 |
|
|
$ |
105.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (net of joint venture and intersegment revenue, see Note (H) of the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements) for the past three years from each of our business segments,
expressed as a percentage of total net revenues were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Percentage of Total Net Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
|
55.8 |
% |
|
|
56.8 |
% |
|
|
54.3 |
% |
Cement |
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Readymix Concrete |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Aggregates |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
GYPSUM WALLBOARD OPERATIONS
Company Operations. We own and operate four gypsum wallboard manufacturing facilities. There
are four primary steps in the manufacturing process: (1) gypsum is mined and extracted from the
ground; (2) the gypsum is then calcined and converted into plaster; (3) the plaster is mixed with
various chemicals and water to produce a mixture known as slurry, which is inserted between two
continuous sheets of recycled paperboard on a high-speed production line and allowed to harden; and
(4) the sheets of gypsum wallboard are then cut to appropriate lengths, dried and bundled for sale.
Gypsum wallboard is used to finish the interior walls and ceilings in residential, commercial and
industrial construction.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our plants:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Gypsum |
|
Estimated Minimum Gypsum |
|
Estimated Gypsum |
Location |
|
Wallboard Capacity (MMSF)(1) |
|
Rock Reserves (years) |
|
Reserve (million tons) |
Albuquerque, New
Mexico |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
50 |
+(2)(3) |
|
|
48 |
(2) |
Bernalillo, New
Mexico |
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
50 |
+(2)(3) |
|
|
48 |
(2) |
Gypsum, Colorado |
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
26 |
(4) |
|
|
16 |
|
Duke, Oklahoma |
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
30 |
(4)(5) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Million Square Feet (MMSF). |
|
(2) |
|
The same reserves serve both New Mexico plants. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes mining claims and leased reserves. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes both owned and leased reserves. |
|
(5) |
|
Additional reserves available. |
Our gypsum wallboard production totaled 2,833 MMSF in fiscal 2006 and 2,572 MMSF in
fiscal 2005. Total gypsum wallboard sales were 2,832 MMSF in fiscal 2006 and 2,547 MMSF in fiscal
2005. Total wallboard production as a percentage of rated capacity was 98% in fiscal 2006 and 93%
in fiscal 2005. The Company operating rates were consistent with industry average capacity
utilization in fiscal 2005 and operated at full capacity this past fiscal year because of record
wallboard demand.
The Company broke ground in March 2006 on a new wallboard plant located in Georgetown, South
Carolina. The plant is expected to be completed late in calendar year 2007 and, upon completion,
will increase total rated annual capacity by 750 MMSF to 3,650 MMSF.
Raw Materials and Fuel Supplies. We mine and extract natural gypsum rock, the principal raw
material used in the manufacture of gypsum wallboard, from mines and quarries owned, leased or
subject to mining claims owned by the Company and located near our plants. We do not presently use
synthetic gypsum although we have a supply agreement with Santee Cooper, a South Carolina utility
company, to utilize this material at our facility currently under construction in South Carolina.
Two leases cover the New Mexico reserves; one with the Pueblo of Zia and the second with the State
of New Mexico. The term of the Zia lease continues for so long as gypsum is produced in paying
quantities, as defined therein. The term of the State lease continues for so long as annual lease
payments are made. We do not anticipate any problems in continuing to extend the term of these
leases for the foreseeable future. Gypsum ore reserves at the Gypsum, Colorado plant are contained
within a total of 115 placer mines encompassing 2,300 acres. Mineral rights are held on an
additional 108 unpatented mining claims where mineral rights can be developed upon completion of
permitting requirements. We currently own land with over 23 million tons of gypsum in the area of
Duke, Oklahoma, with an additional 13 million tons controlled through a lease agreement. Other
gypsum deposits are located near the plant in Duke, which we believe may be obtained at reasonable
costs when needed.
Through our modern low cost paperboard mill we manufacture sufficient quantities of paper
necessary for our gypsum wallboard production. Paper is the largest cost component in the
manufacture of gypsum wallboard currently representing approximately 32% of the production cost.
4
Our gypsum wallboard manufacturing operations use large quantities of natural gas and
electrical power. A significant portion of the Companys natural gas requirements for our gypsum
wallboard plants are currently provided by three gas producers under gas supply agreements expiring
in March 2007 for Colorado, February 2007 for New Mexico, and October 2006 for Oklahoma. If the
agreements are not renewed, we expect to be able to obtain our gas supplies from other suppliers at
competitive prices. Electrical power is supplied to our New Mexico plants at standard industrial
rates by a local utility. Our Albuquerque plant utilizes an interruptible power supply agreement,
which may expose it to some production interruptions during periods of power curtailment. Power
for the Gypsum, Colorado facility is generated at the facility by a cogeneration power plant.
Currently the cogeneration power facility supplies power and waste hot gases for drying to the
gypsum wallboard plant. We do not sell any power to third parties. Gas costs increased
significantly in fiscal 2006 and are expected to level off during fiscal 2007. Gas costs currently
represent approximately 21 % of the production costs.
Sales and Distribution. The principal sources of demand for gypsum wallboard are (i)
residential construction, (ii) repair and remodeling, (iii) non-residential construction, and (iv)
other activities such as exports and manufactured housing, which the Company estimates accounted
for approximately 51%, 29%, 18% and 2%, respectively, of calendar 2005 industry sales. While the
gypsum wallboard industry remains highly cyclical, recent strong residential construction and
growth in the repair and remodeling segment have overstated the impact of fluctuations in
commercial construction increasing gypsum wallboard demand to record levels. Also, demand for
wallboard can be seasonal and is generally greater from spring through the middle of autumn.
The percentage of gypsum wallboard shipments accounted for by new residential construction has
declined in recent years; however, new residential construction remains the largest single source
of gypsum wallboard demand. In recent years, demand has been favorably impacted by a shift toward
more single-family detached housing within the new residential construction segment and by an
increase in the size and volume of the average single-family detached home.
We estimate that the size of the total residential repair and remodel market grew to a record
$275 billion in calendar 2005, up 15% from calendar 2004. Although data on commercial repair and
remodel activity is not readily available, we believe that this segment has also grown
significantly in recent years. The growth of the repair and remodeling market is primarily due to
the aging of housing stock, remodeling of existing buildings and tenant turnover in commercial
space. In addition, repair and remodeling activity has benefited from the fact that it has
increasingly come to be viewed by homeowners, particularly in recessionary periods, as a low cost
alternative to purchasing a new house.
We sell gypsum wallboard to numerous building materials dealers, gypsum wallboard specialty
distributors, lumber yards, home center chains and other customers located throughout the United
States. Two customers with multiple shipping locations accounted for approximately 11% and 10%,
respectively, of our total gypsum wallboard sales during fiscal 2006. The loss of either of these
customers could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
Gypsum
wallboard is sold on a delivered basis. Truck rates have generally
been negotiated for the remainder of calendar year 2006; however, we
are still subject to fuel surcharges from our carriers. Increases in
fuel costs are difficult to pass on to the customers and could negatively
impact our net revenues if significant or prolonged surcharges are
implemented by the carriers.
Although gypsum wallboard is distributed principally in regional areas, the Company and
certain other industry producers have the ability to ship gypsum wallboard by rail outside their
usual regional distribution areas to regions where demand is strong. We own or lease 241 railcars
for transporting gypsum wallboard. In addition, in order to facilitate distribution in certain
strategic areas, we maintain a distribution center in Albuquerque,
New Mexico and four reload yards
in Arizona, California and Illinois. Our rail distribution
5
capabilities permit us to reach customers in all states west of the Mississippi River and many
eastern states. During fiscal 2006, approximately 30% of our sales volume of gypsum wallboard was
transported by rail. Equipment availability for both rail and truck is expected to remain tight
during fiscal 2007.
Competition. There are eight manufacturers of gypsum wallboard in the U.S. operating a total
of 77 plants. We estimate that the three largest producers USG Corporation, National Gypsum
Company and Koch Industries account for approximately 65% of gypsum wallboard sales in the U.S.
In general, a number of our competitors in the gypsum wallboard industry have greater financial,
manufacturing, marketing and distribution resources than the Company. Furthermore, certain of our
competitors operate vertically integrated gypsum wallboard distribution centers, which may provide
them with certain marketing advantages over the Company.
Competition among gypsum wallboard producers is primarily on a regional basis and to a lesser
extent on a national basis. Because of the commodity nature of the product, competition is based
principally on price, which is highly sensitive to changes in supply and demand, and to a lesser
extent, on product quality and customer service.
Currently, total U.S. gypsum wallboard production capacity is estimated at 37.0 billion square
feet per year, a 33% increase from 1998. The Gypsum Association, an industry trade group,
estimates that total calendar 2005 gypsum wallboard shipments by U.S. manufacturers were
approximately 36.2 billion square feet, the highest level on record, resulting in average industry
capacity utilization of approximately 98%.
Capital Expenditures. Capital expenditures during fiscal 2006 for the gypsum wallboard
segment amounted to $3.3 million; $5.8 million in fiscal 2005; and $8.2 million in fiscal 2004.
Capital outlays in fiscal 2007 are estimated to be approximately $109.0 million due primarily to
the construction of the plant in South Carolina with less than 1% of the estimated expenditures
related to compliance with environmental regulations.
Environmental Matters. The gypsum wallboard industry is subject to numerous federal, state
and local laws and regulations pertaining to health, safety and the environment. Some of these
laws, such as the federal Clean Air Act and the federal Clean Water Act (and analogous state laws)
impose environmental permitting requirements and govern the nature and amount of emissions that may
be generated when conducting particular operations. Some laws, such as the federal Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (and analogous state laws) impose
obligations to clean up or remediate spills of hazardous materials into the environment. Other
laws require us to reclaim certain land upon completion of extraction and mining operations in our
quarries. None of the Companys gypsum wallboard operations are presently the subject of any
local, state or federal environmental proceedings or inquiries. The Company does not, and has not,
used asbestos in any of its gypsum wallboard products.
CEMENT OPERATIONS
Company Operations. Our cement production facilities are located in or near Buda, Texas;
LaSalle, Illinois; Laramie, Wyoming; and Fernley, Nevada. The LaSalle, Illinois, Laramie, Wyoming
and Fernley, Nevada facilities are wholly-owned. The Buda, Texas plant is owned by Texas Lehigh
Cement Company LP, a limited partnership joint venture owned 50% by the Company and 50% by Lehigh
Cement Company, a subsidiary of Heidelberg Cement AG. Our LaSalle, Illinois plant operates under
the name Illinois Cement Company, the Laramie, Wyoming plant operates under the name of Mountain
Cement Company and the Fernley, Nevada plant under the name of Nevada Cement Company.
6
Cement is the basic binding agent for concrete, a primary construction material. Our modern
cement plants utilize dry process technology and at present approximately 80% of our clinker
capacity is from preheater or preheater/precalciner kilns. The following table sets forth certain
information regarding these plants:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
Rated Annual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limestone |
|
|
Clinker Capacity |
|
Manufacturing |
|
Number of |
|
Dedication |
|
Reserves |
Location |
|
(M short tons)(1) |
|
Process |
|
Kilns |
|
Date |
|
(Years) |
Buda, TX(2) |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
Dry 4 Stage |
|
1 |
|
1978 |
|
50+(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preheater |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-calciner |
|
|
|
1983 |
|
|
LaSalle, IL |
|
|
640 |
|
|
Dry 4 Stage |
|
1 |
|
1974 |
|
36(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preheater |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laramie, WY |
|
|
640 |
|
|
Dry 2 Stage |
|
1 |
|
1988 |
|
30(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preheater |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dry -Long |
|
1 |
|
1996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dry Kiln |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fernley, NV |
|
|
505 |
|
|
Dry Long |
|
1 |
|
1964 |
|
50+(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dry Kiln |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dry - 1 Stage |
|
1 |
|
1969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preheater |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TotalGross(3) |
|
|
3,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TotalNet(3)(4) |
|
|
2,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
One short ton equals 2,000 pounds. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts shown represent 100% of plant capacity and production. This plant is
owned by a separate partnership in which the Company has a 50% interest. |
|
(3) |
|
Generally, a plants cement grinding production capacity is greater than its
clinker production capacity. |
|
(4) |
|
Net of partners 50% interest in the Buda, Texas plant. |
|
(5) |
|
Owned reserves. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes both owned and leased reserves. |
The Companys net cement production, including its 50% share of the cement Joint Venture
production, and conversion of purchased clinker, totaled 2.8 million tons in fiscal 2006 and 2.4
million tons in fiscal 2005. Total net cement sales, including the Companys 50% share of cement
sales from the Joint Venture, were 3.20 million tons in fiscal 2006 and 2.75 million tons in fiscal
2005 as all four plants sold 100% of the product they produced. During the past two years, we
imported and purchased cement from others to be resold. Purchased cement sales typically occur at
lower gross profit margins. In fiscal 2006, 21.0% of the cement sold by us was acquired from
outside sources, compared to 14.6% in fiscal 2005.
Cement production is capital-intensive and involves high initial fixed costs. The
Company is currently completing an expansion of its Illinois Cement Company plant, and has
announced plans to modernize and expand its Mountain Cement and Nevada Cement facilities. The
Illinois Cement Company plant expansion is expected to be completed in December 2006, and be fully
operational in January 2007. The projects at Mountain Cement Company and Nevada Cement Company are
expected to be completed in late calendar year 2008. Upon completion of these projects, Illinois
Cement Company, Mountain Cement Company and Nevada Cement Company each will have rated annual
clinker capacity of 1.0 million tons, raising total capacity to
4.3 million tons, and net capacity
to near 3.7 million tons. Additionally, each expanded and modernized plant will employ a 5 stage
pre-heater, pre-calciner and one kiln in its manufacturing process.
Raw Materials and Fuel Supplies. The principal raw material used in the production of
portland cement is calcium carbonate in the form of limestone. Limestone is obtained principally
through mining and extraction operations conducted at quarries owned or leased by the Company and
located in close proximity to our plants. We believe that the estimated recoverable limestone
reserves owned or leased by us will permit each of our plants to operate at our present production
capacity for at least 25 years. Other raw materials used in substantially smaller
7
quantities than limestone are sand, clay, iron ore and gypsum. These materials are readily
available and can either be obtained from Company-owned or leased reserves or purchased from
outside suppliers.
Our cement plants use coal and coke as their primary fuel, but are equipped to burn natural
gas as an alternative. We have not used hazardous waste-derived fuels in our plants although our
LaSalle, Illinois and Buda, Texas plants have been permitted to burn scrap tires as a substitute
fuel. Electric power is also a major cost component in the manufacturing process and we have
sought to diminish overall power costs by adopting interruptible power supply agreements. These
agreements may expose us to some production interruptions during periods of power curtailment.
Sales and Distribution. In the past, demand for cement has been cyclical, derived from the
demand for concrete products which, in turn, is derived from demand for construction. However,
recently construction spending and cement consumption have been more stable and growing, primarily
because of increased public construction associated with transportation bills passed by Congress.
The construction sector is also affected by the general condition of the economy as well as
regional economic influences. Regional cement markets experience peaks and valleys correlated with
regional construction cycles. Additionally, demand for cement is seasonal, particularly in
northern states where inclement weather affects construction activity. Sales are generally greater
from spring through the middle of autumn than during the remainder of the year. The impact on the
Company of regional construction cycles may be mitigated to some degree by our geographic
diversification.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the geographic area served by
each of our cement plants and the location of our distribution terminals in each area. We have a
total of 10 cement storage and distribution terminals that are strategically located to extend the
sales areas of our plants.
|
|
|
|
|
Plant Location |
|
Principal Geographic Areas |
|
Distribution Terminals |
Buda, Texas
|
|
Texas and western Louisiana
|
|
Corpus Christi, Texas
Houston, Texas
Orange, Texas
Roanoke (Ft. Worth), Texas
Waco, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
LaSalle, Illinois
|
|
Illinois and southern Wisconsin
|
|
Hartland, Wisconsin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laramie, Wyoming
|
|
Wyoming, Utah, Colorado and western Nebraska
|
|
Salt Lake City, Utah Denver, Colorado
North Platte, Nebraska |
|
|
|
|
|
Fernley, Nevada
|
|
Northern Nevada and northern California
|
|
Sacramento, California |
Cement is distributed directly to our customers by common carriers and customer pickups
from plants or distribution terminals. We transport cement principally by rail to our storage and
distribution terminals. No single customer accounted for 10% or more of our cement sales during
fiscal 2006. Sales are made on the basis of competitive prices in each area. As is customary in
the industry, the Company does not typically enter into long-term sales contracts, except with
respect to major construction projects and oil service company contracts.
Competition. The cement industry is extremely competitive as a result of multiple domestic
suppliers and the importation of foreign cement through various terminal operations. Competition
among producers and suppliers of cement is based primarily on price, with consistency of quality
and service to customers being important but of lesser significance. Price competition among
individual producers and suppliers of cement within a geographic area is intense because of the
fungible nature of the product. Because of cements low value-to-weight ratio, the relative cost
of transporting cement on land is high and limits the geographic area in which each company can
market its products economically. Therefore, the U.S. cement industry is fragmented into regional
geographic areas rather than a single national selling area. No single cement company has a
8
distribution of plants extensive enough to serve all geographic areas, so profitability is
sensitive to shifts in the balance between regional supply and demand.
Cement imports into the U.S. occur primarily to supplement domestic cement production. Cement
is typically imported into deep water ports or transported on the Mississippi River system near
major population centers to take advantage of lower waterborne freight costs versus higher truck
and rail transportation costs that U.S. based manufacturers incur to deliver into the same areas.
The U.S. Government and the Government of Mexico have entered into an agreement providing for
the elimination of the antidumping duties imposed by the U.S. on cement imported from Mexico. The
agreement provides for a three year transition period during which the volume of Mexican cement
imported into the southern tier of the U.S. will be limited to approximately 3 million metric tons
per year and the antidumping duty imposed on Mexican cement will be set at $3 per ton. This is not
expected to impact cement prices in the short term as the Portland Cement Association (PCA)
estimates that the current industry wide domestic production capacity is 25% short of domestic
consumption.
The PCA estimates that imports represented approximately 25% of cement used in the U.S. during
calendar 2005 as compared with approximately 21% in 2004 and 20% in 2003.
Capital Expenditures. Capital expenditures during fiscal 2006 amounted to $48.2 million
compared with $8.5 million and $1.8 million in fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively, not including
capital expenditures associated with the joint venture. The increase in fiscal 2006 is due
primarily to the expansion of our Illinois Cement Company facility, which is expected to be
completed during fiscal 2007. Capital outlays in fiscal 2007 are estimated to be approximately
$35.8 million. Approximately 10% of the estimated fiscal 2007 total is related to compliance with
environmental regulations.
Environmental Matters. Our operations are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws
and regulations pertaining to health, safety and the environment. Some of these laws, such as the
federal Clean Air Act and the federal Clean Water Act (and analogous state laws) impose
environmental permitting requirements and govern the nature and amount of emissions that may be
generated when conducting particular operations. Some laws, such as the federal Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) (and analogous state laws)
impose obligations to clean up or remediate spills of hazardous materials into the environment.
Other laws require us to reclaim certain land upon completion of extraction and mining operations
in our quarries. We believe that the Company has obtained all the material environmental permits
that are necessary to conduct our operations. We further believe that the Company is conducting
its operations in substantial compliance with these permits. In addition, none of the Companys
sites is listed as a CERCLA Superfund site.
Four environmental issues involving the cement manufacturing industry deserve special mention.
The first issue involves cement kiln dust or CKD. The federal Environmental Protection Agency, or
EPA, has been evaluating the regulatory status of CKD under the federal Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) for a number of years. In 1999, the EPA proposed a rule that would allow
states to regulate properly-managed CKD as a non-hazardous waste under state laws and regulations
governing solid waste. In contrast, CKD that was not properly managed would be treated as a
hazardous waste under RCRA. In 2002, the EPA confirmed its intention to exempt properly-managed
CKD from the hazardous waste requirements of RCRA. The agency announced that it would collect
additional data over the next three to five years to determine if the states regulation of CKD is
effective, which may lead the EPA to withdraw its 1999 proposal to treat any CKD as a hazardous
waste. Final action implementing the 2002 announcement is expected to
occur in August 2007.
Currently, substantially all CKD produced in connection with our ongoing operations is
recycled, and therefore such CKD is not viewed as a hazardous waste under RCRA. However, CKD was
historically collected and stored on-site at our Illinois, Nevada and Wyoming cement plants and at
a former plant site in Corpus Christi, Texas, which is no longer in operation. If either the EPA
or the states decide to impose management standards on this CKD at some point in the future, the
Company could incur additional costs to comply with those requirements with respect to its
historically collected CKD. CKD that comes in contact with water might
9
produce a leachate with an alkalinity high enough to be classified as hazardous and might also
leach certain hazardous trace metals therein.
A second industry environmental issue involves the historical disposal of refractory brick
containing chromium. Such refractory brick was formerly used widely in the cement industry to line
cement kilns. The Company currently does not use refractory containing chromium and crushes spent
refractory brick, and then uses it as raw feed in the kiln.
A third industry environmental issue involves the potential regulation of greenhouse gases
from cement plants. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas that many scientists and others believe
contributes to the warming of the Earths atmosphere. Although no restrictions have yet been
imposed under U.S. federal laws, it is possible that cement plants may be targeted because of the large
amounts of carbon dioxide generated during the manufacturing process. Any imposition of raw
materials or production limitations or fuel-use or carbon taxes could have a significant impact on
the cement manufacturing industry.
Fourth, the U.S. EPA has promulgated regulations for certain toxic air pollutants including
standards for portland cement manufacturing. The maximum attainable control technology standards
require cement plants to test for certain pollutants and meet certain emission and operating
standards. Management has no reason to believe, however, that these standards have placed the
Company at a competitive disadvantage.
Management believes that our current procedures and practices in our operations, including
those for handling and managing hazardous materials, are consistent with industry standards and are
in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. Nevertheless,
because of the complexity of operations and compliance with environmental laws, there can be no
assurance that past or future operations will not result in violations, remediation or other
liabilities or claims. Moreover, we cannot predict what environmental laws will be enacted or
adopted in the future or how such future environmental laws or regulations will be administered or
interpreted. Compliance with more stringent environmental laws, or stricter interpretation of
existing environmental laws, could necessitate significant capital outlays.
RECYCLED PAPERBOARD OPERATIONS
Company Operations. Our recycled paperboard manufacturing operation is located in Lawton,
Oklahoma and was acquired in November 2000 along with certain other related assets that were sold
or closed in fiscal 2002 and 2003.
All of our paper products are manufactured from 100% recovered (recycled) paper fiber.
Products manufactured primarily include the facing and backside paper used in the manufacture of
gypsum wallboard; other recycled paperboard grades used by manufacturers of consumer packaging
(e.g. corrugated medium and linerboard); and industrial paperboard products (e.g. angle board, tube
and core board) are also produced for diversity and mill optimization.
The Mill. The mill is designed to manufacture gypsum-grade recycled paperboard utilizing
various modern technologies that produces recycled paperboard that is up to 20% lighter than that
currently generally available in the U.S., but with similar strength characteristics. Because
gypsum-grade recycled paperboard generally is sold on the basis of surface area, manufacturing
lighter paper potentially translates into higher profit margins per ton for the recycled paperboard
manufacturer. Lighter recycled paperboard also reduces drying costs associated with the production
of gypsum wallboard and reduces inbound and outbound freight costs of both recycled paperboard and
gypsum wallboard. In addition to producing a product that is more attractive to customers, our
lighter weight, better quality recycled paperboard reduces production and transportation costs at
our gypsum wallboard plants.
Manufacturing Process. Recycled paperboard is manufactured in a continuous process during
which reclaimed paper fiber is mixed with water and pulped to separate the individual fibers. This
mixture is passed through a series of filters and cleaners to remove all of the undesirable
materials (e.g. tapes, glass, staples, glues, waxes) from the recovered fiber to produce slurry.
The slurry is then diluted to a very low concentration
10
and is then applied to a series of traveling wire screens through a mechanical distribution system.
The paper machine is designed so that four individual webs of paper are combined to form one
multi-ply sheet of paperboard. The excess water from this process is allowed to be drained through
the wire mesh fabric and is continuously recycled for additional paper making. The multi-ply paper
mat is then mechanically pressed, steam dried and trimmed to specific customer size and packaging
requirements. The finished product is wound in roll form weighing approximately 2.5 tons and
containing 2.2 miles of paper. It is made specifically to customer quality specifications.
Raw Materials. The principal raw materials are recovered paper fiber (in other words,
wastepaper), water and specialty paper chemicals. Several different types of recovered fiber (e.g.
newspaper, grocery store boxes, etc.) are formulated together to give the desired paperboard
qualities. Recovered paper fiber is currently purchased from several sources, with 44% currently
being under contractual commitments.
We believe that adequate supplies of recovered paper fiber will continue to be available from
generators and wholesalers located within a 400-mile radius of the mill. One third of all purchased
fiber is supplied by rail. Recovered paper fiber is a commodity bought, sold and traded under the
guidelines of the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, Inc. (ISRI). Monthly pricing is
established in several industry publications based on location. Prices are subject to fluctuations
based on supply, demand and export. The current outlook for fiscal 2007 is for wastepaper prices
to increase moderately during the first half of the fiscal year and stabilize for the remainder of
the fiscal year. Current customer contracts include price escalators to compensate for changes in
raw material prices.
Chemicals, including size, retention aids, bactericides and strength aids, used by the Company
in its recycled paperboard operations are environmentally friendly and are readily available from
several manufacturers at competitive prices.
The manufacture of recycled paperboard involves the use of large volumes of water both in the
production process and for cooling purposes. The mill uses water provided under an agreement with
the City of Lawton, Oklahoma municipal services. The term of the agreement with the City of
Lawton, Oklahoma is fifteen years (commencing in calendar 1999) with two automatic five-year
extensions unless the Company notifies the City in writing at least six months prior to the
expiration of the term or extended term. Although adequate sources of water have historically been
available, an extended period of general water shortages, legal curtailment of any mills current
water sources or uses, or deterioration of the current quality of water could adversely affect the
mills operations and limit its production capacity.
Electricity, natural gas and other utilities are available to the mill either at contracted
rates or at standard industrial rates in adequate supplies, subject to standard industrial
curtailment provisions. If periods of natural gas curtailment or unfavorable pricing occur, the
Lawton mill is equipped to use fuel oil as an alternative fuel. The mill has a four year contract
for natural gas transportation.
Paperboard mills are generally large consumers of natural gas. During fiscal 2006, natural
gas pricing significantly increased; however, prices are expected to level off during fiscal 2007.
If natural gas prices continue to increase, they are expected to negatively impact fiscal 2007
production costs and operating earnings. The mill is subject to an electricity supply agreement
with Public Service of Oklahoma and because of the power companys large dependence on natural gas
our power rates have dramatically increased this past year.
Sales and Distribution. Our manufactured recycled paperboard products are sold primarily to
gypsum wallboard manufacturers. During fiscal 2006, approximately 40% of the recycled paperboard
manufactured and shipped by the mill was consumed by the Companys gypsum wallboard manufacturing
operations, 40% was sold to St. Gobain pursuant to a paper supply contract (the St. Gobain
Agreement) and approximately 20% was shipped to other gypsum wallboard manufacturers and
containerboard manufacturers. Originally, the St. Gobain Agreement was entered into by Republic
Paperboard and James Hardie Gypsum Inc.; however, subsequent to the agreement, James Hardies North
American gypsum wallboard operations were acquired by BPB Gypsum, whose operations were purchased
during fiscal 2006 by St. Gobain. The St. Gobain Agreement
11
is a long-term paper supply contract with sales to St. Gobain made at a defined base price
determined at the time of execution of the St. Gobain Agreement. This defined price is subject to
adjustment based on changes in the major variable costs of production of recycled paperboard.
Under this agreement, the mill is obligated to sell and St. Gobain is obligated to purchase at
least 95% (plus or minus 5%) of the gypsum-grade recycled paperboard requirements of three of St.
Gobains plants. The loss of St. Gobain as a customer or a termination or reduction of its
production of gypsum wallboard, unless replaced by a commercially similar arrangement, could have a
material adverse effect on the Company.
Competition. When selling the portion of our production not under long term contract or not
consumed by our gypsum wallboard manufacturing operations, we compete with approximately nine other
manufacturers of gypsum-grade paperboard, six of which have gypsum wallboard manufacturing
operations. During periods of peak demand for gypsum wallboard, the demand for recycled paperboard
typically matches or exceeds the productive capacities of the gypsum-grade paperboard producers.
During periods of reduced demand for gypsum wallboard, the demand for recycled paperboard falls,
and selling prices may decrease on open market tonnage. Production sold outside of the gypsum
paperboard industry is generally at lower margins.
Price, quality and timeliness of deliveries are the principal methods of competition among
gypsum paperboard producers. The location of our mill allows us to serve a variety of markets,
including several gypsum wallboard plants in the mid-west, southeast, southwest and western U.S.
Environmental Matters. Prior to November 2000, the Companys now closed Commerce City,
Colorado paper mill (the Commerce City Mill) had investigated the presence of subsurface
petroleum hydrocarbons at the mill site and had retained an environmental consultant who concluded
that fuel oil, jet fuel, and gasoline additives had migrated in the subsurface of the property from
an adjacent property. As a result of an additional subsequent investigation by the Commerce City
Mill, new environmental conditions were uncovered that appear to stem from underground storage tank
use on the mill site. The Commerce City Mill and a former owner of the Commerce City Mill have
entered into a participation agreement with the Division of Oil and Public Safety of the Colorado
Department of Labor and Employment (the Oil Division) to respond to those conditions that appear
to stem from historical underground storage tank use. Under the participation agreement, the
Commerce City mill will pay 25% (with the former owner paying 75%) of the costs associated with the
investigation and remediation efforts approved by both parties. The Company and the former owner
have each approved and submitted to the Oil Division a Corrective Action Plan (the CAP) for the
removal of the subsurface petroleum hydrocarbon at the Commerce City Mill. The CAP was approved by
the Oil Inspection Section in calendar 2002. It is estimated that this CAP will cost approximately
$2.5 million and take approximately eight years to complete. Under the participation agreement,
the Company will pay 25% (or approximately $625,000, of which a portion has been paid and the
remainder is fully accrued) of such estimated costs. There can be no assurance, however, that the
actual costs of remediation will not exceed these estimates.
Capital Expenditures. Capital expenditures during fiscal 2006 for the paperboard operations
were $4.9 million, $4.5 million in fiscal 2005 and $1.3 million in fiscal 2004. Capital
expenditures for fiscal 2007 have been estimated at approximately $7.6 million. This increase is
due to completion of projects started in fiscal 2006 related to equipment upgrades and plant
automation. None of the estimated fiscal 2007 capital outlays are related to compliance with
environmental regulations.
CONCRETE AND AGGREGATES OPERATIONS
Company Operations. Readymix concrete, a versatile, low-cost building material used in almost
all construction, involves the mixing of cement, sand, gravel, or crushed stone and water to form
concrete which is then sold and distributed to numerous construction contractors. Concrete is
produced in batch plants and transported to the customers job site in mixer trucks.
The construction aggregates business consists of the mining, extraction, production and sale
of crushed stone, sand, gravel and lightweight aggregates such as expanded clays and shales.
Construction
12
aggregates of suitable characteristics are employed in virtually all types of construction,
including the production of portland cement concrete and asphaltic mixes in highway construction
and maintenance.
We produce and distribute readymix concrete from company owned sites north of Sacramento,
California and in Austin, Texas. The following table sets forth certain information regarding
these operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Number of Plants |
|
Number of Trucks |
Northern California |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Austin, Texas |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Austin, Texas market, which is our largest concrete market, was negatively impacted
by the market conditions affecting technology companies that began in 2000; however, there has been
improvement in both pricing and demand during fiscal 2006. Our net readymix concrete sales were
883,000 cubic yards in fiscal 2006 and 769,000 cubic yards in fiscal 2005. We anticipate adding an
additional plant in our Austin market during fiscal 2007.
We conduct aggregate operations near our concrete facilities in northern California and
Austin, Texas. Aggregates are obtained principally by mining and extracting from quarries owned or
leased by the Company. The following table sets forth certain information regarding these
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Annual |
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production Capacity |
|
Minimum |
Location |
|
Types of Aggregates |
|
(Thousand tons) |
|
Reserves (Years) |
Northern California |
|
Sand and Gravel |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
100+ |
(1) |
Austin, Texas |
|
Limestone |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
60 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Owned reserves through various subsidiaries. |
|
(2) |
|
Leased reserves. |
The Companys total net aggregate sales were 5.7 million tons in fiscal 2006 and 5.2
million tons in fiscal 2005. Total aggregates production was 5.8 million tons for fiscal 2006 and
5.4 million for fiscal 2005. A portion of the Companys total aggregates production is used
internally by the Companys readymix concrete operations.
Raw Materials. The Company supplies approximately 100% and 50% of its cement requirements for
its Austin and northern California concrete operations, respectively. The Company supplies
approximately 34% and 52%, respectively, of its aggregates requirements for its Austin and northern
California concrete operations. The Company obtains the balance of its cement and aggregates
requirements from multiple sources in each of these areas.
We mine and extract limestone and sand and gravel, the principal raw materials used in the
production of aggregates, from quarries owned or leased by the Company and located near its plants.
The northern California quarry is estimated to contain over one billion tons of sand and gravel
reserves. The Austin, Texas quarry is covered by a lease which expires in 2060. Based on its
current production capacity, the Company estimates its northern California and Austin, Texas
quarries contain over 100 years and approximately 60 years of reserves, respectively.
Sales and Distribution. Demand for readymix concrete and aggregates largely depends on local
levels of construction activity. The construction sector is subject to weather conditions, the
availability of financing at reasonable rates and overall fluctuations in local economies, and
therefore tends to be cyclical. We sell readymix concrete to numerous contractors and other
customers in each plants selling area. Our batch plants in Austin and northern California are
strategically located to serve each selling area. Concrete is delivered from the batch plants by
trucks owned by the Company.
13
We sell aggregates to building contractors and other customers engaged in a wide variety of
construction activities. Aggregates are delivered from our aggregate plants by common carriers and
customer pick-up. One customer accounted for approximately 10% of our concrete sales, and another
customer accounted for approximately 10% of our aggregate sales during fiscal 2006. Presently we
are attempting to secure a rail link from our principal aggregates deposit north of Sacramento,
California to extended markets in northern California.
Competition. Both the concrete and aggregates industries are highly fragmented, with numerous
participants operating in each local area. Because the cost of transporting concrete and
aggregates is very high relative to product values, producers of concrete and aggregates typically
can sell their products only in areas within 50 miles of their production facilities. Barriers to
entry in each industry are low, except with respect to environmental permitting requirements for
new aggregate production facilities and zoning of land to permit mining and extraction of
aggregates.
Both concrete and aggregates are commodity products. Each type of aggregate is sold in
competition with other types of aggregates and in competition with other producers of the same type
of aggregates. Accordingly, competition in both the concrete and aggregates businesses is based
principally on price and, to a lesser extent, on product quality and customer service.
Capital Expenditures. Capital expenditures during fiscal 2006 amounted to $11.1 million for
the concrete and aggregates segment compared with $3.5 million and $1.0 million in fiscal 2005 and
2004, respectively. The increase in capital expenditures in fiscal 2006 relates primarily to the
acquisition of a dredge at our northern California operation which began production during the
fiscal year. Capital outlays in fiscal 2007 are estimated to be
approximately $10.0 million. Approximately 10%
of the estimated fiscal 2007 capital expenditures are related to compliance with environmental
regulations.
Environmental Matters. The concrete and aggregates industry is subject to environmental
regulations similar to those governing our cement operations. None of our concrete or aggregates
operations are presently the subject of any local, state or federal environmental proceeding or
inquiries.
EMPLOYEES
As of March 31, 2006, we had approximately 1,600 employees.
As of March 31, 2006, we had approximately 400 employees employed under collective bargaining
agreements and various supplemental agreements with local unions.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We make our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on
Form 8-K, and all amendments to these reports available free of charge through the investor
relations page of our website, located at
www.eaglematerials.com as soon as reasonably practicable
after they are filed with or furnished to the SEC. Alternatively, you may contact our investor
relations department directly at (214) 432-2000 or by writing to Eagle Materials Inc., Investor
Relations, 3811 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 1100, Dallas, Texas 75219.
14
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
These statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause the Companys
actual results to be materially different from planned or expected results. Those risks and
uncertainties include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
Levels of construction spending. Demand for the Companys products is directly
related to the level of activity in the construction industry, which includes
residential, commercial and infrastructure construction. Furthermore, activity in the
infrastructure construction business is directly related to the amount of government
funding available for such projects. Any decrease in the amount of government funds
available for such projects or any decrease in construction activity in general,
including continued slow down of home building activity, could have a material adverse
effect on the Companys financial condition and results of operations. |
|
|
|
|
Interest rates. The Companys business is significantly affected by the movement of
interest rates. Interest rates have a direct impact on the level of residential,
commercial and infrastructure construction activity put in place. Higher interest
rates could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
In addition, increases in interest rates could result in higher interest expense
related to the Companys borrowings under its credit facilities. |
|
|
|
|
Price fluctuations and supply/demand for our products. The products sold by the
Company are commodities and competition among manufacturers is based largely on price.
Prices are often subject to material changes in response to relatively minor
fluctuations in supply and demand, general economic conditions and other market
conditions beyond our control. Increases in the production capacity for products such
as gypsum wallboard may create an oversupply of such products and negatively impact
product prices. There can be no assurance that prices for products sold by the Company
will not decline in the future or that such declines will not have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations. |
|
|
|
|
Significant changes in the cost of, and the availability of, fuel, energy and other
raw materials. Significant increases in the cost of fuel, energy or raw materials used
in connection with our businesses or substantial decreases in their availability could
materially and adversely affect our sales and operating profits. Major cost components
in each of our businesses are the cost of fuel, energy and raw materials. Prices for
fuel, energy or raw materials used in connection with our businesses could change
significantly in a short period of time for reasons outside our control. In the event
of large or rapid increases in prices, we may not be able to pass the increases through
to our customers in full, which would reduce our operating margin. |
|
|
|
|
The seasonal nature of the Companys business. A majority of our business is
seasonal with peak revenues and profits occurring primarily in the months of April
through November. Quarterly results have varied significantly in the past and are
likely to vary significantly from quarter to quarter in the future. Such variations
could have a negative impact on the price of the Companys common stock. |
|
|
|
|
National and regional economic conditions. A majority of our revenues are from
customers who are in industries and businesses that are cyclical in nature and subject
to changes in general economic conditions. In addition, since operations occur in a
variety of geographic markets, our businesses are subject to the economic conditions in
each such geographic market. General economic downturns or localized downturns in the
regions where we have operations, including any downturns in the construction industry
or increases in capacity in the gypsum wallboard, paperboard and cement industries,
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations. |
15
|
|
|
Unfavorable weather conditions during peak construction periods and other unexpected
operational difficulties. Because a majority of our business is seasonal, bad weather
conditions and other unexpected operational difficulties during peak periods could adversely affect
operating income and cash flow and could have a disproportionate impact on our results
of operations for the full year. |
|
|
|
|
Competition from new or existing competitors or the ability to successfully
penetrate new markets. The construction products industry is highly competitive. If
we are unable to keep our products competitively priced, our sales could be reduced
materially. Also, we may experience increased competition from companies offering
products based on new processes that are more efficient or result in improvements in
product performance, which could put us at a disadvantage and cause us to lose
customers and sales volume. Our failure to continue to compete effectively could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations. |
|
|
|
|
Environmental liabilities. Our operations are subject to state, federal and local
environmental laws and regulations, which impose liability for cleanup or remediation
of environmental pollution and hazardous waste arising from past acts; and require
pollution control and prevention, site restoration and operating permits and/or
approvals to conduct certain of its operations. Certain of our operations may from
time-to-time involve the use of substances that are classified as toxic or hazardous
substances within the meaning of these laws and regulations. Risk of environmental
liability is inherent in the operation of our businesses. As a result, it is possible
that environmental liabilities could have a material adverse effect on the Company in
the future. |
|
|
|
|
Compliance with governmental regulations. Our operations and our customers are
subject to and affected by federal, state and local laws and regulations with respect
to land usage, street and highway usage, noise level and health and safety and
environmental matters. In many instances, various permits are required for
construction and related operations. Although management believes that we are in
compliance in all material respects with regulatory requirements, there can be no
assurance that the Company will not incur material costs or liabilities in connection
with regulatory requirements or that demand for its products will be affected by
regulatory issues affecting its customers. |
|
|
|
|
Events that may disrupt the U.S. or world economy. Future terrorist attacks, the
ensuing U.S. military and other responsive actions, could have a significant adverse
effect on the general economic, market and political conditions, which in turn could
have material adverse effect on the Companys business. |
|
|
|
|
Significant changes in the cost and availability of transportation. Some of the raw
materials used in our manufacturing processes, such as coal or coke, are transported to
our facilities by truck or rail. In addition, the transportation costs associated with
the delivery of our wallboard products are a significant portion of the variable cost
of the wallboard division. Significant increases in the cost of fuel or energy can
result in material increases in the cost of transportation which could materially and
adversely affect our operating profits. In addition, reductions in the availability
of certain modes of transportation such as rail or trucking could limit our ability to
deliver product and therefore materially and adversely affect our operating profits. |
In general, the Company is subject to the risks and uncertainties of the construction industry
and of doing business in the U.S. The forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this
report, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update them, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
16
ITEM
1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
There are no unresolved staff comments.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We operate cement plants, quarries and related facilities at Buda, Texas; LaSalle, Illinois;
Fernley, Nevada and Laramie, Wyoming. The Buda plant is owned by a partnership in which EXP has a
50% interest. Our principal aggregate plants and quarries are located in the Austin, Texas area
and Marysville, California. In addition, we operate gypsum wallboard plants in Albuquerque and
nearby Bernalillo, New Mexico, Gypsum, Colorado and Duke, Oklahoma. We produce recycled paperboard
at Lawton, Oklahoma. None of our facilities are pledged as security for any debts.
See Item 1. Business on pages 1-14 of this Report for additional information relating to the
Companys properties.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are a party to certain ordinary legal proceedings incidental to our business. In general,
although the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain, we believe that all of the pending
litigation proceedings in which the Company or any subsidiary is currently involved are likely to
be resolved without having a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition or
operations of the Company.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
17
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
STOCK PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
On April 11, 2006, the shareholders of the Company voted to eliminate our dual class capital
structure by exchanging each share of our outstanding Common Stock and Class B Common Stock into a
new class of common stock. Accordingly, all stock information has been retroactively restated as
if the combination had taken place as of the earliest period presented. As of May 24, 2006 there
were approximately 2,852 holders of record of our Common Stock which trades on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol EXP.
The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices for our Common Stock as reported on
the New York Stock Exchange for the periods indicated, as well as dividends paid during these
periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2006 |
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2005 |
Quarter ended: |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Dividends |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Dividends |
June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
31.41 |
|
|
$ |
24.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
24.04 |
|
|
$ |
19.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
40.26 |
|
|
$ |
30.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
23.98 |
|
|
$ |
19.85 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
41.52 |
|
|
$ |
31.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
29.02 |
|
|
$ |
20.89 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
March 31, 2006 (1) |
|
$ |
63.76 |
|
|
$ |
37.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
28.95 |
|
|
$ |
25.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Quarterly dividend increased 75% to $0.175 per quarter payable in April 2006. |
We currently expect that quarterly cash dividends comparable to the $0.175 per share
quarterly dividend will continue to be paid throughout fiscal 2007.
SHARE REPURCHASES
The Companys Board of Directors has approved the repurchase of a cumulative total of
26,453,805 shares of the Companys Common Stock for repurchase since the Company became publicly
held in April 1994. On January 24, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to
repurchase up to an additional 2,749,563 shares, for a total authorization of 3,000,000 currently
outstanding. The Company repurchased 4,547,163 shares, 1,986,600 shares and 175,500 shares of
Common Stock at a cost of $165.3 million, $43.8 million and $3.1 million in the years ended March
31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The total number of shares purchased in the table below represents shares of Common Stock
repurchased pursuant to the Board of Directors authorization dated November 29, 1998, as amended
July 28, 2004 and January 24, 2006. Share repurchases may be made from time-to-time in the open
market or in privately negotiated transactions. The timing and amount of any repurchases of shares
will be determined by Company management, based on its evaluation of market and economic conditions
and other factors.
Purchases of the Companys Common Stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2006 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
Maximum Number of |
|
|
Total Number |
|
Average |
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
Shares that May Yet |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Price Paid |
|
Publicly Announced |
|
be Purchased Under |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Per Share |
|
Plans or Programs |
|
the Plans or Programs |
January 1 through January 31, 2006 |
|
|
139,200 |
|
|
$ |
40.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1 through February 28,
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1 through March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter 4 Totals |
|
|
139,200 |
|
|
$ |
40.92 |
|
|
|
139,200 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
18
The equity compensation plan information set for in Part III, Item 12 of this Form 10-K
is hereby incorporated by reference into this Part II, Item 5.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA(1)
(amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Revenues |
|
$ |
859,702 |
|
|
$ |
616,541 |
|
|
$ |
502,622 |
|
|
$ |
429,178 |
|
|
$ |
395,188 |
|
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
241,066 |
|
|
|
158,089 |
|
|
|
102,123 |
|
|
|
86,613 |
|
|
|
59,699 |
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
160,984 |
|
|
|
106,687 |
|
|
|
66,901 |
|
|
|
57,606 |
|
|
|
39,706 |
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
|
3.02 |
|
|
|
1.91 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
|
Cash Dividends Per Share |
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
2.15 |
(2) |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
|
888,916 |
|
|
|
780,001 |
|
|
|
692,975 |
|
|
|
706,355 |
|
|
|
737,323 |
|
|
Total Debt |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
84,800 |
|
|
|
82,880 |
|
|
|
80,927 |
|
|
|
182,380 |
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
464,738 |
|
|
|
485,368 |
|
|
|
439,022 |
(2) |
|
|
479,611 |
|
|
|
427,832 |
|
|
Book Value Per Share At Year End |
|
$ |
9.24 |
|
|
$ |
8.88 |
|
|
$ |
7.80 |
|
|
$ |
8.70 |
|
|
$ |
7.77 |
|
|
Average Diluted Shares Outstanding |
|
|
53,330 |
|
|
|
55,884 |
|
|
|
56,208 |
|
|
|
55,572 |
|
|
|
55,383 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Financial Highlights should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for
matters that affect the comparability of the information presented above. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes a special one-time $2.00 per share ($112.9 million total) dividend
paid in connection with the Spin-off from Centex Corporation. |
19
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Strong residential construction and a recovering commercial construction demand in all of our
markets helped to set record fiscal 2006 sales volume, revenues and earnings per share. Demand in
all of our markets was strong as we reported increased sales volume in each of our segments for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. The majority of our earnings improvement was in the Gypsum
Wallboard and Cement operations. Fiscal 2006 revenues increased 39% to $859.7 million, net
earnings were up 51% to $161.0 million and diluted earnings per share were up 58% to $3.02.
Gypsum Wallboard sales volume was up 11% and represented record volume for the Company due to
record industry demand while operating earnings increased 89% due to a 27% increase in average
sales price. Fiscal 2006 was the 20th consecutive sold-out year for our cement
operations. Cement sales volume increased 16%, and operating earnings increased 36% from last year
due to higher average net sales prices offset primarily by the impact of increased purchased cement
volumes and costs. Paperboard reported record sales volume, however operating earnings declined
due to reduced sales price and increased production costs, mainly natural gas. Concrete and
Aggregates operating earnings improved 24% over last fiscal year due primarily to a record sales
volume in concrete. Corporate expenses increased $6.1 million due primarily to increased headcount
and greater salary and benefit costs, including stock compensation.
Manufacturing costs in fiscal 2006 were negatively impacted by increased natural gas, coal,
power, paper fiber and maintenance costs. Demand for energy related products continued at a high
level and prices for these products are expected to level off in fiscal 2007. Ordinary maintenance
costs are expected to remain flat in fiscal 2007, although there will be some additional
maintenance costs related to the completion of the Illinois Cement expansion project.
We operate in cyclical commodity businesses. Downturns in overall economic activity usually
have a significant adverse effect on these businesses due to decreased demand and reduced pricing.
Recently, wallboard demand has been favorably impacted by strong residential construction. Recent
increases in interest rates are expected to bring a reduction in new residential construction
activity; however, commercial and industrial activity, which are showing signs of improvement, may
help to offset reduced demand in the residential construction sector if interest rates continue to
increase. Cement demand continues to be positively impacted by a strong national highway funding
program. The funds allocated by Congress in the new highway bill exceed the prior highway funding
program.
Strong demand from new housing and residential remodeling resulted in record wallboard
consumption for calendar 2005. According to the Gypsum Association, national wallboard consumption
of 36.2 billion square feet for calendar 2005, the highest level on record, was up 5.6% from last
years consumption. Industry utilization rates have been at the 95%+ level, resulting in a 27%
increase in our net wallboard pricing for fiscal 2006. We implemented price increases in April,
June, September and, December 2005 and March 2006.
U.S.
cement consumption continues to be strong. Total U.S. cement
shipments of approximately 139 million
short tons for calendar 2005 were a record high and were 5.7% above calendar 2004. Cement imports
for calendar 2005 were 37 million short tons, 23% above last years imports. The U.S. Cement
Industry has been sold out for the last 11 years as a result of a domestic capacity deficit.
Current U.S. demand requires imports of over 25% to supplement domestic capacity. The U.S. Cement
Industry is anticipating a tight supply of imported cement this year due to high freight rates and
increasing consumption in world markets. Cement pricing has increased 17% over prior year, the
second straight year of price increases, reversing a slight decline over the prior three years. We
implemented cumulative price increases of between $10.00 and $20.00 per ton in all our markets
during fiscal 2006.
20
Our recycled paperboard mill continued operational improvements and is now
producing at 150% above its original design capacity.
The Company conducts one of its cement operations through a joint venture, Texas Lehigh Cement
Company LP, which is located in Buda, Texas (the Joint Venture). The Company owns a 50% interest
in the joint venture and accounts for its interest under the equity method of accounting. However,
for purposes of the Cement segment information presented, the Company proportionately consolidates
its 50% share of the Joint Ventures revenues and operating earnings, which is the way management
organizes the segments within the Company for making operating decisions and assessing performance.
See Note (H) of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional segment
information.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal Year 2006 Compared to Fiscal Year 2005
Consolidated Results. Consolidated net revenues for fiscal 2006 were up 39% from fiscal 2005
driven by higher sales prices and volumes in all segments, especially Gypsum Wallboard and Cement.
Fiscal 2006 operating earnings of $263.8 million were up 54% from $171.7 million last fiscal year
mainly due to increased Gypsum Wallboard and Cement operating earnings.
The following tables lists by line of business the revenues and operating earnings discussed
in our operating segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Operating Earnings(1) |
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
479,134 |
|
|
$ |
350,101 |
|
|
$ |
154,227 |
|
|
$ |
81,616 |
|
|
Cement |
|
|
285,289 |
|
|
|
211,343 |
|
|
|
78,311 |
|
|
|
57,616 |
|
|
Paperboard |
|
|
133,482 |
|
|
|
125,184 |
|
|
|
20,087 |
|
|
|
25,406 |
|
|
Concrete & Aggregates |
|
|
89,778 |
|
|
|
70,786 |
|
|
|
9,613 |
|
|
|
7,742 |
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
(721 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
989,962 |
|
|
|
757,607 |
|
|
$ |
263,777 |
|
|
$ |
171,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Intersegment Revenues |
|
|
(65,096 |
) |
|
|
(58,812 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Joint Venture Revenues |
|
|
(65,164 |
) |
|
|
(82,254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
859,702 |
|
|
$ |
616,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Prior to Corporate General and Administrative and interest expense. |
Corporate Overhead. Corporate general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2006 were
$16.4 million compared to $10.3 million for last fiscal year. The increase was primarily the
result of increased headcount and higher compensation and benefit costs, including the expensing of
employee stock compensation in accordance with a change in accounting standards.
Other Income. Other income consists of a variety of items that are non-segment operating in
nature and includes clinker sales income, non-inventoried aggregates income, gypsum wallboard
distribution center income, asset sales and other miscellaneous income and cost items.
Net Interest Expense. Net interest expense of $6.3 million for fiscal 2006 increased $3.1
million from fiscal 2005 due to increased borrowings.
Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2006 increased to 33.2% from 32.5% primarily
due to an increase in state income tax expense partially offset by a revision of certain estimates
utilized by the Company for permanent items included within the corporate tax filings and the new
domestic production activities deduction.
21
Net Income. As a result of the foregoing, pre-tax earnings of $241.1 million were 52% above
fiscal 2005 pre-tax earnings of $158.1 million. Fiscal 2006 net earnings of $161.0 million
increased 51% from net earnings of $106.7 million in fiscal 2005. Diluted earnings per share in
fiscal 2006 of $3.02 were 58% higher than the $1.91 for fiscal 2005.
GYPSUM WALLBOARD OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues, as reported |
|
$ |
479,134 |
|
|
$ |
350,101 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
Freight and Delivery Costs billed to customers |
|
|
(89,374 |
) |
|
|
(73,140 |
) |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
389,760 |
|
|
$ |
276,961 |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (MMSF) |
|
|
2,832 |
|
|
|
2,547 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Average Net Sales Price (1) |
|
$ |
137.65 |
|
|
$ |
108.74 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Unit Costs |
|
$ |
83.17 |
|
|
$ |
76.70 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
54.48 |
|
|
$ |
32.04 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
154,227 |
|
|
$ |
81,616 |
|
|
|
89 |
% |
Freight per MSF |
|
$ |
31.57 |
|
|
$ |
28.72 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net of freight per MSF. |
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
Price increases throughout the year and record Company
wallboard shipments positively impacted revenues for
fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. Pricing has
continued to strengthen as consumption was at an
all-time high resulting in the near full capacity
utilization of the U.S. wallboard industry. Our sales
volume of 2,832 MMSF represents a record for the
Company as the Company operated at full capacity. |
|
|
|
Operating Margins:
|
|
Operating margins were impacted by
increasing paper costs and
transportation costs for raw materials, as well as
natural gas costs which increased 43% in fiscal 2006 as
compared to fiscal 2005. On a per unit basis, freight
costs, which are deducted to determine average net
sales price, have increased 10% from fiscal 2005.
Operating earnings for fiscal 2006 represented the
highest earnings in Company history. |
|
|
|
Outlook:
|
|
Throughout fiscal 2006 industry utilization rates
averaged about 95% and as a result pricing has remained
strong in all of the markets we serve. We implemented
a 10% price increase in late March 2006, which helped
us achieve an average net sales price of approximately
$165.00 during April 2006. Demand remains strong with
supply being currently allocated. Single family
residential housing is expected to decline during
fiscal 2007 at an estimated rate of 5% to 10%; however
we anticipate that commercial construction and repair
and remodel demand will remain strong. Expected
capacity additions during fiscal 2007 are not expected
to be significant; therefore industry utilization, even
with the anticipated decline in single family
residential housing, is expected to remain high. |
22
CEMENT OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues, including intersegment |
|
$ |
285,289 |
|
|
$ |
211,343 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
Freight and Delivery Costs billed to customers |
|
|
(19,212 |
) |
|
|
(16,499 |
) |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
266,077 |
|
|
$ |
194,844 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (M Tons) |
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Average Net Sales Price |
|
$ |
83.15 |
|
|
$ |
70.77 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Unit Costs (including imports and
purchased cement) |
|
$ |
58.68 |
|
|
$ |
49.84 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
24.47 |
|
|
$ |
20.93 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
78,311 |
|
|
$ |
57,616 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
Price increases were implemented throughout the fiscal
year, which resulted in a 17% increase in average sales
prices for fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005.
Sales volume was greater due to our purchase of the
remaining 50% interest in Illinois Cement Company
during January 2005, which resulted in our
consolidating all of the sales revenue from Illinois in
fiscal 2006, and only 50% for the majority of fiscal
2005. Additionally, consumption was at an all-time
high due to several favorable market factors, such as
increased construction spending and very favorable
weather conditions in our markets. |
|
|
|
Operating Margins:
|
|
Operating margins increased during fiscal 2006 as
compared to fiscal 2005, primarily due to increased
sales prices. The increases in sales prices were
slightly offset by increased volumes of low margin
purchased cement, which increased to 675,000 tons in
fiscal 2006 from 402,000 tons in fiscal 2005, an
increase of 68%. Additionally, fuel and energy costs
increased 20% over the prior year period due primarily
to increased cost of petroleum coke and coal and
electricity. |
|
|
|
Outlook:
|
|
U.S. cement consumption remains strong as a result of
strong federal and state infrastructure projects,
strong housing activity and a recovering commercial
construction market. The passage of the $286.4
billion, six-year federal highway transportation bill
SAFETEALU in July of 2005 represents a 40% increase
over the previous TEA 21 bill and is anticipated to
further strengthen the long-term demand for cement in
the U.S. The U.S. Government and the Government of
Mexico have entered into an agreement providing for the
elimination of the antidumping duties imposed by the
U.S. on cement imported from Mexico. The agreement
provides for a three year transition period during
which the volume of Mexican cement imported into the
southern tier of the U.S. will be limited to 3 million
metric tons per year and the antidumping duty imposed
on Mexican cement will be set at $3 per ton. This is
not expected to impact cement prices in the short term
as the Portland Cement Association estimates that the
current industry wide domestic production capacity is
25% short of domestic consumption. Additionally
the major Mexican cement producers also own a much
larger percentage of US domestic production than
previously when dumping occurred. In the near
term, we expect U.S. cement pricing to remain stable or
increase due to strong domestic consumption, increasing
world demand and historically high international
freight costs for imported cement. The Company has sold
100% of its production for the last 20 years and
anticipates selling all of its fiscal 2007 production. |
23
RECYCLED PAPERBOARD OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues, including intersegment |
|
$ |
133,482 |
|
|
$ |
125,184 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Freight and Delivery Costs billed to customers |
|
|
(2,587 |
) |
|
|
(3,048 |
) |
|
|
-15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
130,895 |
|
|
$ |
122,136 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (M Tons) |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Average Net Sales Price |
|
$ |
452.63 |
|
|
$ |
455.73 |
|
|
|
-1 |
% |
Unit Costs |
|
$ |
383.12 |
|
|
$ |
360.93 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
69.51 |
|
|
$ |
94.99 |
|
|
|
-27 |
% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
20,087 |
|
|
$ |
25,406 |
|
|
|
-21 |
% |
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
Paperboard achieved price increases in gypsum paper,
primarily as a result of previously established price
escalators in its contracts; however, prices declined
for trims, containerboard and B grade, which made up a
larger percentage of total sales in fiscal 2006
compared to fiscal 2005. Due to the change in sales
mix, average sales price declined slightly in fiscal
2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. Total sales volume
increased 8% due to a 16,000 ton increase in non-gypsum
paperboard and higher sales to our wallboard division.
Paperboard sales to our wallboard division were 114,000
tons at $57.5 million compared to 109,000 tons at $54.1
million for last year. |
|
|
|
Operating Margins:
|
|
Our operating margin per ton was adversely impacted by
increased sales of lower margin containerboard and B
grade paper during fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal
2005. Additionally, operating margins were adversely
impacted by increased natural gas, electricity and
repair costs, offset positively by reduced recovered
fiber costs. |
|
|
|
Outlook:
|
|
As a result of strong market demand, capital
improvements and improved operating efficiency, our
paperboard mill is currently producing at 150% of its
original design capacity. While we anticipate
continued strong demand for our products over the next
six to twelve months, continued increases in natural
gas and electricity costs over the next six months may
adversely affect operating earnings. |
24
CONCRETE AND AGGREGATES OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
CONCRETE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues |
|
$ |
55,269 |
|
|
|
42,228 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (M Yards) |
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Average Net Sales Price |
|
$ |
62.61 |
|
|
$ |
54.92 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Unit Costs |
|
$ |
55.37 |
|
|
$ |
51.01 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
7.24 |
|
|
$ |
3.91 |
|
|
|
85 |
% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
6,395 |
|
|
$ |
3,007 |
|
|
|
113 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGGREGATES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues, including intersegment |
|
$ |
34,509 |
|
|
$ |
28,558 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
Freight & Delivery Cost billed to customers |
|
|
(831 |
) |
|
|
(1,071 |
) |
|
|
-22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
33,678 |
|
|
$ |
27,487 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (M Tons) |
|
|
5,714 |
|
|
|
5,196 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Average Net Sales Price |
|
$ |
5.89 |
|
|
$ |
5.29 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Unit Costs |
|
$ |
5.33 |
|
|
$ |
4.38 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
|
-38 |
% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
3,218 |
|
|
$ |
4,735 |
|
|
|
-32 |
% |
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
Revenues increased in for both concrete and aggregates
during fiscal 2006 due to increases in sales prices and
volumes due to strong construction activity in both the
Austin, Texas and Sacramento, California markets.
Aggregate pricing in Austin has increased by 18% during
fiscal 2006 from fiscal 2005. |
|
|
|
Operating Margins:
|
|
Increases in operating margins for concrete are due
primarily to increased sales prices in fiscal 2006 as
compared to fiscal 2005, partially offset by increased
raw materials (cement and aggregates) and delivery
costs. Operating margins for aggregates declined for
fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005, primarily due
to significantly higher mobile equipment maintenance
costs, as well as the timing of other plant maintenance
projects. |
|
|
|
Outlook:
|
|
Concrete pricing in the Austin, Texas market increased
during fiscal 2006 as a result of increased
construction activity in the region in both the
commercial and residential sectors. We expect improved
pricing in the Austin, Texas market and continued
strong pricing in the northern California market in
fiscal 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregates pricing in the Sacramento area is expected
to continue to remain strong in the near term due
primarily to demand outpacing capacity. Aggregates
pricing in the Austin, Texas market is anticipated to
increase moderately over the near term due to increased
levels of construction activity in the Austin area and
a changing mix in the products sold. |
25
Fiscal Year 2005 Compared to Fiscal Year 2004
Consolidated Results. Consolidated net revenues for fiscal 2005 were up 23% from fiscal 2004
driven by higher sales prices and volumes in all segments, especially Gypsum Wallboard and Cement.
Fiscal 2005 operating earnings of $171.7 million were up 49% from $115.2 million last fiscal year
mainly due to increased Gypsum Wallboard and Cement operating earnings.
The following tables lists by line of business the revenues and operating earnings discussed
in our operating segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Operating Earnings(1) |
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
350,101 |
|
|
$ |
272,924 |
|
|
$ |
81,616 |
|
|
$ |
35,604 |
|
Cement |
|
|
211,343 |
|
|
|
181,846 |
|
|
|
57,616 |
|
|
|
50,450 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
125,184 |
|
|
|
112,366 |
|
|
|
25,406 |
|
|
|
20,942 |
|
Concrete & Aggregates |
|
|
70,786 |
|
|
|
63,117 |
|
|
|
7,742 |
|
|
|
5,971 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
2,242 |
|
|
|
(721 |
) |
|
|
2,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
757,607 |
|
|
|
632,495 |
|
|
$ |
171,659 |
|
|
$ |
115,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Intersegment Revenues |
|
|
(58,812 |
) |
|
|
(53,567 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Joint Venture Revenues |
|
|
(82,254 |
) |
|
|
(76,306 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
616,541 |
|
|
$ |
502,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Prior to Corporate General and Administrative and interest expense. |
Corporate Overhead. Corporate general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2005 were
$10.3 million compared to $9.3 million for last fiscal year. The increase was primarily the result
of increased consulting expenses, higher compensation and benefit costs and costs associated with
Sarbanes Oxley, partially offset by the absence of $2.5 million in direct expenses related to the
spin-off transaction included in fiscal 2004.
Other Income. Other income consists of a variety of items that are non-segment operating in
nature and includes clinker sales income, non-inventoried aggregates income, gypsum wallboard
distribution center income, asset sales and other miscellaneous income and cost items.
Net Interest Expense. Net interest expense of $3.3 million for fiscal 2005 declined $0.6
million from fiscal 2004 due to lower debt balances and reduced borrowing costs.
Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2005 declined to 32.5% from 33.9% primarily
due to legal, advisory and consultant costs incurred in fiscal 2004 related to the spin-off
transaction which were not deductible for tax purposes and, a current year state tax benefit of
$2.3 million as a result of a lower effective state tax rate applied to our anticipated state
deferred tax balances.
Net Income. As a result of the foregoing, pre-tax earnings of $158.1 million were 55% above
fiscal 2004 pre-tax earnings of $102.1 million. Fiscal 2005 net earnings of $106.7 million
increased 59% from net earnings of $66.9 million in fiscal 2004. Diluted earnings per share in
fiscal 2005 of $1.91 were 61% higher than the $1.19 for fiscal 2004.
26
GYPSUM WALLBOARD OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues, as reported |
|
$ |
350,101 |
|
|
$ |
272,924 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
Freight and Delivery Costs billed to customers |
|
|
(73,140 |
) |
|
|
(60,977 |
) |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
276,961 |
|
|
$ |
211,947 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (MMSF) |
|
|
2,547 |
|
|
|
2,437 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Average Net Sales Price (1) |
|
$ |
108.74 |
|
|
$ |
86.97 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Unit Costs |
|
$ |
76.70 |
|
|
$ |
72.36 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
32.04 |
|
|
$ |
14.61 |
|
|
|
119 |
% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
81,616 |
|
|
$ |
35,604 |
|
|
|
129 |
% |
Freight per MSF |
|
$ |
28.72 |
|
|
$ |
25.02 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net of freight per MSF. |
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
Price increases throughout the year and record Company
wallboard shipments positively impacted revenues for
fiscal 2005 as compared to prior year. Pricing
strengthened as a result of record demand resulting in
the near full capacity utilization of the U.S.
wallboard industry. Our sales volume of 2,547 MMSF
represented a record for the Company. |
|
|
|
Operating Margins:
|
|
Operating margins were impacted by increasing
transportation costs, natural gas and paper costs. On
a per unit basis, freight costs, which are deducted to
determine average net sales price, increased 15%
compared to fiscal 2004. Operating earnings
represented the second highest earnings in Company
history. |
|
|
|
Outlook:
|
|
Strong demand from new housing resulted in record
wallboard consumption for calendar 2004. According to
the Gypsum Association, calendar 2004 national
wallboard consumption of 34.2 billion square feet was
up 8% from last years same period. |
|
|
|
|
|
Throughout fiscal 2005 industry utilization rates
trended upward in excess of 92% and as a result,
pricing firmed up in all of the markets we serve. We
implemented a 10% price increase in late April 2005 in
all of the markets we serve and another 15% price
increase was announced in May 2005 to be implemented in
July of 2005. Wallboard pricing, however, has
historically softened during the winter season due to
lower levels of construction activity. |
27
CEMENT OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues, including intersegment |
|
$ |
211,343 |
|
|
$ |
181,846 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Freight and Delivery Costs billed to customers |
|
|
(16,499 |
) |
|
|
(15,608 |
) |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
194,844 |
|
|
$ |
166,238 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (M Tons) |
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
2,518 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Average Net Sales Price |
|
$ |
70.77 |
|
|
$ |
66.02 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Unit Costs (including imports and purchased cement) |
|
$ |
49.84 |
|
|
$ |
45.98 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
20.93 |
|
|
$ |
20.04 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
57,616 |
|
|
$ |
50,450 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
Price increases were implemented during the first and
fourth quarters of fiscal 2005 in the majority of our
markets resulting in record average sales prices for
the Company. Additionally, fiscal 2005 sales volume
was a record high due to high levels of construction
activity and favorable weather conditions in our
markets. The tight supply of cement in these markets
resulted in sold out conditions at all of our plants
for fiscal 2005. |
|
|
|
Operating Margins:
|
|
We continue to utilize purchased cement to supplement
our production capacities in certain markets that we
serve. Purchased cement tons were 402,000 tons in
fiscal 2005 versus 219,000 tons in the prior year and
impacted current year average cost per ton by $1.87 per
ton. Fuel and power costs increased 9% over the prior
year period due primarily to increased cost of
petroleum coke and coal. |
|
|
|
Outlook:
|
|
U.S. cement consumption was strong as a result of
strong housing activity, a recovering commercial
construction market and federal and state
infrastructure projects. U.S. cement pricing increased
due to strong domestic consumption, increasing world
consumption and high international freight costs for
imported cement. Total U.S. shipments of 132 million
short tons for calendar 2004, were 4% above the same
period in calendar 2003. Cement imports for calendar
2004, were 30 million short tons or 17.5% above last
years imports. The Company has been sold out for the
last 19 years and it is estimated that current
industry-wide domestic production capacity is 20% short
of domestic consumption. |
28
RECYCLED PAPERBOARD OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues, including intersegment |
|
$ |
125,184 |
|
|
$ |
112,366 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Freight and Delivery Costs billed to customers |
|
|
(3,048 |
) |
|
|
(2,355 |
) |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
122,136 |
|
|
$ |
110,011 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (M Tons) |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Average Net Sales Price |
|
$ |
455.73 |
|
|
$ |
416.71 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Unit Costs |
|
$ |
360.93 |
|
|
$ |
337.38 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
94.99 |
|
|
$ |
79.33 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
25,406 |
|
|
$ |
20,942 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
Paperboard achieved price increases in each of the
products it sells, primarily as a result of previously
established contract escalators associated with the
price of the waste paper. Paperboard sales to our
wallboard division were 109 thousand tons at $54.1
million compared to 107 thousand tons at $49.3 million
for last year. |
|
|
|
Operating Margins:
|
|
Cost-of-sales per ton was impacted primarily by higher
recovered fiber costs of $20.00 per ton, higher fuel
costs of $2.80 per ton, higher chemical costs of $3.50
per ton and higher inbound freight costs of $5.00 per
ton, offset positively by the mix of products sold and
lower returns and allowances. |
|
|
|
Outlook:
|
|
As a result of strong market demand, capital
improvements and improved operating efficiency, our
paperboard mill is currently producing at 125% of its
original design capacity, and we anticipate continued
strong demand for our products over the next twelve
months. However, announced recycled container board
production expansion could place upward price pressure
on recovered fiber as supply tightens. |
29
CONCRETE AND AGGREGATES OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
CONCRETE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues |
|
$ |
42,228 |
|
|
$ |
40,226 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (M Yards) |
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Average Net Sales Price |
|
$ |
54.92 |
|
|
$ |
52.79 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Unit Costs |
|
$ |
51.01 |
|
|
$ |
48.87 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
3.91 |
|
|
$ |
3.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
3,007 |
|
|
$ |
2,987 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGGREGATES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues, including intersegment |
|
$ |
28,558 |
|
|
$ |
22,891 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Freight and Delivery Costs billed to customers |
|
|
(1,071 |
) |
|
|
(558 |
) |
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
27,487 |
|
|
$ |
22,333 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (M Tons) |
|
|
5,196 |
|
|
|
4,228 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
Average Net Sales Price |
|
$ |
5.29 |
|
|
$ |
5.24 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Unit Costs |
|
$ |
4.38 |
|
|
$ |
4.53 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
Operating Margin |
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
4,735 |
|
|
$ |
2,984 |
|
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
Concrete revenues were impacted primarily by increased
average sales prices of $4.74 per cubic yard in the
northern California market and $1.94 per cubic yard in
the Austin, Texas market versus the prior year, offset
by decreased volumes in the northern California market.
We recorded record volumes throughout fiscal 2005;
driven by the northern California market where demand
outpaced supply. Pricing strengthened in northern
California and was up 7% as compared to the prior year.
Aggregates volumes for the Austin, Texas market
increased 39% versus the prior year period due to
higher sales of road base. Sales of road base were at
lower prices than washed aggregates products and
therefore negatively impacted the average Texas sales
price of aggregates by 6% versus the prior year. |
|
|
|
Operating Margins:
|
|
Concrete margins were negatively impacted by increased
raw materials (cement and aggregates) and delivery
costs. In both of our markets the majority of such
costs were passed through to customers via price
increases reflected above. Costs were impacted
negatively by higher contract mining costs and higher
maintenance costs versus last year. Aggregates costs
per ton remained essentially flat due to fixed costs
being spread over larger sales volumes. |
|
|
|
Outlook:
|
|
While concrete pricing in the Austin, Texas market
increased slightly, pricing was below the national
average and well below pricing in the northern
California market. We expect this trend to continue
for the next twelve months. Additionally, we expect
continued stable pricing in the northern California
market. We expect that aggregates pricing in the
northern California area will continue to strengthen
due primarily to demand outpacing capacity. Aggregates
pricing in the Austin, Texas market increased
moderately in fiscal 2005 due to increased levels of
construction activity in the Austin area and a changing
mix in the products sold. |
30
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Certain of our critical accounting policies require the use of judgment in their application
or require estimates of inherently uncertain matters. Although our accounting policies are in
compliance with generally accepted accounting principles, a change in the facts and circumstances
of the underlying transactions could significantly change the application of the accounting
policies and the resulting financial statement impact. Listed below are those policies that we
believe are critical and require the use of complex judgment in their application.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. We assess long-lived assets in accordance with the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. SFAS No. 144 requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount
of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. These
evaluations for impairment are significantly impacted by estimates of revenues, costs and expenses
and other factors. If these assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized
is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the
assets.
Goodwill. Pursuant to SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is no
longer subject to amortization. Rather, goodwill is subject to at least an annual assessment for
impairment by applying a fair-value-based test. We have elected to test for goodwill impairment in
the first quarter of each calendar year. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process, which
requires management to make judgments in determining what assumptions to use in the calculation.
The first step of the process consists of estimating the fair value of each reporting unit based on
a discounted cash flow model using revenues and profit forecasts and comparing those estimated fair
values with the carrying value; a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment
by determining a implied fair value of goodwill. Similar to the review for impairment of other
long-lived assets, evaluations for impairment are significantly impacted by estimates of future
prices for our products, capital needs, economic trends and other factors.
Environmental Liabilities. Our operations are subject to state, federal and local
environmental laws and regulations, which impose liability for cleanup or remediation of
environmental pollution and hazardous waste arising from past acts and require pollution control
and prevention, site restoration and operating permits and/or approvals to conduct certain of its
operations. We record environmental accruals when it is probable that a reasonably estimable
liability has been incurred. Environmental remediation accruals are based on internal studies and
estimates, including shared financial liability with third parties. Environmental expenditures
that extend the life, increase the capacity, improve the safety or efficiency of assets or mitigate
or prevent future environmental contamination may be capitalized. Other environmental costs are
expensed when incurred.
Estimation of Reserves and Valuation Allowances. We evaluate the collectibility of accounts
receivable based on a combination of factors. In circumstances when we are aware of a specific
customers inability to meet its financial obligation to the Company, the balance in the reserve
for doubtful accounts is evaluated, and if determined to be deficient, a specific amount will be
added to the reserve. For all other customers, the reserve for doubtful accounts is determined by
the length of time the receivables are past due or the status of the customers financial
condition.
31
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity.
The following table provides a summary of our cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities: |
|
$ |
188,246 |
|
|
$ |
157,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Illinois Cement 50% Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,000 |
) |
Capital Expenditures and Other Investing Activities, net |
|
|
(72,929 |
) |
|
|
(20,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
(72,929 |
) |
|
|
(92,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess Tax Benefits |
|
|
1,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
Addition to Note Payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,700 |
|
Addition to (Reduction in) Long-term Debt, net |
|
|
115,200 |
|
|
|
(4,780 |
) |
Retirement of Common Stock |
|
|
(165,335 |
) |
|
|
(43,754 |
) |
Dividends Paid |
|
|
(21,312 |
) |
|
|
(22,203 |
) |
Proceeds from Stock Option Exercises |
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
|
3,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities |
|
|
(67,772 |
) |
|
|
(60,526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Cash |
|
$ |
47,545 |
|
|
$ |
3,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $31.0 million increase in cash flows from operating activities for fiscal 2006 was
largely attributable to increased earnings. This increase was offset by the change in working
capital, primarily the increase in accounts receivable.
Working capital at March 31, 2006 was $112.0 million compared to $19.8 million at March 31,
2005. The increase resulted primarily from a reduction of $30.8 million in notes payable and an
increase of $43.9 million in cash related to the senior note borrowing during fiscal 2006. The
remaining difference was due primarily to the $23.1 million increase in accounts and notes
receivable.
Total debt increased from $84.8 million at March 31, 2005, to $200.0 million at March 31, 2006
due to the Senior Note borrowing. Debt-to-capitalization at March 31, 2006, was 30.1% compared to
14.9% at March 31, 2005.
Based on our financial condition and results of operations as of and for the year ended March
31, 2006, along with the projected net earnings for fiscal 2007, we believe that our internally
generated cash flow coupled with funds available under various credit facilities will enable us to
provide adequately for our current operations, dividends, capital expenditures and future growth
through the end of fiscal 2007. The Company was in compliance at March 31, 2006 and during the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, with all the terms and covenants of its credit agreements and
expects to be in compliance during the next 12 months.
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $54.8 million at March 31, 2006, compared to $7.2 million at
March 31, 2005.
Debt Financing Activities.
On December 16, 2004, we amended our existing credit facility to increase the facility amount
from $250 million to $350 million, modified certain financial and other covenants and extended the
maturity date to 2009 (the Bank Credit Facility). The Bank Credit Facility expires on December
16, 2009, at which time all outstanding borrowings are due. The borrowings under the Bank Credit
Facility are guaranteed by all
32
major operating subsidiaries of the Company. At the option of the Company, outstanding
principal amounts on the Bank Credit Facility bear interest at a variable rate equal to: (i) LIBOR,
plus an agreed margin (ranging from 87.5 to 162.5 basis points), which is to be established
quarterly based upon the Companys ratio of consolidated EBITDA to its consolidated indebtedness;
or (ii) an alternate base rate which is the higher of (a) the prime rate or (b) the federal funds
rate plus 1/2% per annum, plus an agreed margin (ranging from 25 to 100 basis points). Interest
payments are payable monthly or at the end of the LIBOR advance periods, which can be up to a
period of six months at the option of the Company. Under the Bank Credit Facility, we are required
to adhere to a number of financial and other covenants, including covenants relating to the
Companys interest coverage ratio and consolidated funded indebtedness ratio. At March 31, 2006
the Company had $342.1 million of borrowings available under the Bank Credit Facility.
On November 15, 2005, we entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the Note Purchase
Agreement) related to our sale of $200 million of senior, unsecured notes, designated as Series
2005A Senior Notes (the Senior Notes) in a private placement transaction. The Senior Notes are
guaranteed by substantially all of the Companys subsidiaries. The Senior Notes were sold at par
on November 15, 2005 and were issued in three tranches, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Interest Rate |
Tranche A |
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
November 15, 2012 |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
Tranche B |
|
$ |
80,000 |
|
|
November 15, 2015 |
|
|
5.38 |
% |
Tranche C |
|
$ |
80,000 |
|
|
November 15, 2017 |
|
|
5.48 |
% |
Interest for each tranche of Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on the 15th
day of May and the 15th day of November of each year until all principal is paid for the
respective tranche.
Our obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement and the Senior Notes are equal in right of
payment with all other senior, unsecured debt of the Company, including our debt under the Bank
Credit Facility. The Note Purchase Agreement contains customary restrictive covenants, including
covenants that place limits on our ability to encumber our assets, to incur additional debt, to
sell assets, or to merge or consolidate with third parties, as well as certain cross covenants with
the Bank Credit Facility.
The Company paid all outstanding amounts and terminated its trade receivables securitization
facility (the Receivables Securitization Facility) in December 2005. The Receivables
Securitization Facility had been fully consolidated on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets
prior to cancellation.
Other than the Bank Credit Facility, the Company has no other source of committed external
financing in place. In the event the Bank Credit Facility was terminated, no assurance can be
given as to the Companys ability to secure a new source of financing. Consequently, if a balance
is outstanding on the Bank Credit Facility at the time of termination, and an alternative source of
financing cannot be secured, it would have a material adverse impact on the Company. None of the
Companys debt is rated by the rating agencies.
The Company does not have any off balance sheet debt except for operating leases. Other than
the Receivables Securitization Facility, which was terminated in December 2005, the Company did not
have any other transactions, arrangements or relationships with special purpose entities. Also,
the Company has no outstanding debt guarantees. The Company has available under the Bank Credit
Facility a $25 million Letter of Credit Facility. At March 31, 2006, the Company had $7.9 million
of letters of credit outstanding that renew annually. We are contingently liable for performance
under $6.9 million in performance bonds relating primarily to our mining operations.
Cash used for Share Repurchases and Stock Repurchase Program
See table under Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities on pages 18 and 19.
On January 26, 2006, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of an
additional 2,749,563 shares of common stock, raising our repurchase authorization to approximately
3,000,000
33
shares, which remain available at March 31, 2006. Share repurchases may be made from time-to-time
in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The timing and amount of any
repurchases of shares will be determined by the Companys management, based on its evaluation of
market and economic conditions and other factors.
Dividends.
Dividends paid in fiscal years 2006 and 2005 were $21.3 million and $22.2 million,
respectively. Each quarterly dividend payment is subject to review and approval by our Board of
Directors, and we will continue to evaluate our dividend payment amount on an ongoing basis.
During January 2006 we announced an increase in our annual dividend from $0.40 to $0.70 per share,
beginning with the April 2006 dividend payment.
Capital Expenditures.
The following table compares capital expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Land and Quarries |
|
$ |
2,067 |
|
|
$ |
2,671 |
|
Plants |
|
|
56,376 |
|
|
|
15,059 |
|
Buildings, Machinery and Equipment |
|
|
14,486 |
|
|
|
4,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital Expenditures |
|
$ |
72,929 |
|
|
$ |
22,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historically, we have financed such expenditures with cash from operations and borrowings
under our revolving credit facility. We expect to make capital expenditures of approximately
$160.0 million during fiscal 2007. The increase in capital spending is due primarily to our
beginning construction on the wallboard plant in South Carolina.
Contractual Obligations.
The Company has certain contractual obligations covering manufacturing, transportation and
certain other facilities and equipment. Future payments due, aggregated by type of contractual
obligation are set forth as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Contractual Obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt/Note Payable |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
Operating Leases |
|
|
9,032 |
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
2,549 |
|
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
3,472 |
|
Purchase Obligations |
|
|
47,339 |
|
|
|
37,985 |
|
|
|
9,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
256,371 |
|
|
$ |
39,993 |
|
|
$ |
11,903 |
|
|
$ |
1,003 |
|
|
$ |
203,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations are non-cancelable agreements to purchase coal and natural gas, to
pay royalty amounts and capital expenditure commitments. The Company expects to sign a contract
during fiscal 2007 relating to the construction of the wallboard plant in Georgetown, South
Carolina.
Based on our current estimates, we do not anticipate making any additional contributions to
our defined benefit plans for fiscal year 2007.
34
Inflation and Changing Prices
Inflation has not been a significant factor in the U.S. economy as the rate of increase has
moderated during the last several years. The Consumer Price Index rose approximately 3.4% in
calendar 2005, 3.3% in 2004, and 1.9% in 2003. Prices of materials and services, with the
exception of power, natural gas, coal, coke, and transportation freight have remained relatively
stable over the three-year period. During fiscal 2006, the Consumer Price Index for energy and
transportation rose approximately 17.1% and 4.8%, respectively. Strict cost control and improved
productivity have minimized the impact of inflation on our operations, as has the ability to
recover increasing costs by obtaining higher sales prices. The ability to increase sales prices to
cover future increases varies with the level of activity in the construction industry, the number,
size, and strength of competitors and the availability of products to supply a local market.
GENERAL OUTLOOK
See outlook within Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations on pages 20-30.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Footnote (A) to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 41.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain sections of this report including Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
Private Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the context
of the statement and generally arise when the Company is discussing its beliefs, estimates or
expectations. We specifically disclaim any duty to update any of the information set forth in
this report, including any forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements are made based
on managements current expectations and beliefs concerning future events and, therefore, involve a
number of risks and uncertainties. Management cautions that forward-looking statements are not
guarantees, and our actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the
forward looking statements. See Item 1A for a more detailed discussion of specific risks and
uncertainties.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on our Bank Credit
Facility. From time-to-time we have utilized derivative instruments, including interest rate
swaps, in conjunction with our overall strategy to manage the debt outstanding that is subject to
changes in interest rates. At March 31, 2006 there were no outstanding borrowings under the Bank
Credit Facility. Presently, we do not utilize derivative financial instruments.
The Company is subject to commodity risk with respect to price changes principally in coal,
coke, natural gas and power. We attempt to limit our exposure to changes in commodity prices by
entering into contracts or increasing use of alternative fuels.
35
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
Index to Financial Statements and Related Information |
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
36
Eagle Materials Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
479,134 |
|
|
$ |
350,101 |
|
|
$ |
272,924 |
|
Cement |
|
|
213,980 |
|
|
|
125,480 |
|
|
|
102,250 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
75,935 |
|
|
|
71,076 |
|
|
|
63,110 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
88,374 |
|
|
|
69,691 |
|
|
|
62,096 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
2,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
859,702 |
|
|
|
616,541 |
|
|
|
502,622 |
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
|
324,907 |
|
|
|
268,484 |
|
|
|
237,320 |
|
Cement |
|
|
162,586 |
|
|
|
94,785 |
|
|
|
75,711 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
55,848 |
|
|
|
45,671 |
|
|
|
42,168 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
78,761 |
|
|
|
61,949 |
|
|
|
56,125 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate General and Administrative |
|
|
16,370 |
|
|
|
10,280 |
|
|
|
9,272 |
|
Interest Expense, net |
|
|
6,341 |
|
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
3,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
645,553 |
|
|
|
485,373 |
|
|
|
424,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF UNCONSOLIDATED
JOINT VENTURES |
|
|
26,917 |
|
|
|
26,921 |
|
|
|
23,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
241,066 |
|
|
|
158,089 |
|
|
|
102,123 |
|
Income Taxes |
|
|
80,082 |
|
|
|
51,402 |
|
|
|
35,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS |
|
$ |
160,984 |
|
|
$ |
106,687 |
|
|
$ |
66,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
3.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.93 |
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
3.02 |
|
|
$ |
1.91 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIVIDENDS PER SHARE |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
2.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
37
Eagle Materials Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
$ |
54,766 |
|
|
$ |
7,221 |
|
Accounts and Notes Receivable, net |
|
|
94,061 |
|
|
|
70,952 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
67,799 |
|
|
|
63,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
216,626 |
|
|
|
141,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment - |
|
|
856,227 |
|
|
|
788,447 |
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation |
|
|
(298,665 |
) |
|
|
(264,088 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, net |
|
|
557,562 |
|
|
|
524,359 |
|
Investments in Joint Venture |
|
|
27,847 |
|
|
|
28,181 |
|
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
|
|
67,854 |
|
|
|
66,960 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
19,027 |
|
|
|
18,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
888,916 |
|
|
$ |
780,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note Payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30,800 |
|
Accounts Payable |
|
|
51,562 |
|
|
|
40,687 |
|
Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
53,137 |
|
|
|
50,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
104,699 |
|
|
|
121,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
119,479 |
|
|
|
118,764 |
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, Par Value $0.01;
Authorized 5,000,000 Shares; None Issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, Par Value $0.01; Authorized 100,000,000
Shares; Issued and Outstanding 50,318,797 and 54,675,834
Shares, respectively. |
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Losses |
|
|
(1,404 |
) |
|
|
(1,842 |
) |
Retained Earnings |
|
|
465,639 |
|
|
|
486,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
464,738 |
|
|
|
485,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
888,916 |
|
|
$ |
780,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
38
Eagle Materials Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
160,984 |
|
|
$ |
106,687 |
|
|
$ |
66,901 |
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Earnings to Net Cash Provided
by Operating Activities, Net of Effect of Non-Cash Activity - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization |
|
|
38,599 |
|
|
|
34,496 |
|
|
|
33,022 |
|
Deferred Income Tax Provision |
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
17,942 |
|
|
|
21,826 |
|
Stock Compensation Expense |
|
|
2,820 |
|
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
|
|
(26,916 |
) |
|
|
(26,921 |
) |
|
|
(23,911 |
) |
Distributions from Joint Ventures |
|
|
27,250 |
|
|
|
30,917 |
|
|
|
26,149 |
|
Excess Tax Benefits from Share Based Payment Arrangements |
|
|
(1,662 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and Notes Receivable |
|
|
(23,109 |
) |
|
|
(12,483 |
) |
|
|
(12,028 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(4,317 |
) |
|
|
(6,948 |
) |
|
|
248 |
|
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
11,711 |
|
|
|
12,967 |
|
|
|
1,936 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
2,119 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
(2,832 |
) |
Income Taxes Payable |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
(1,793 |
) |
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
188,246 |
|
|
|
157,202 |
|
|
|
112,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
|
(72,929 |
) |
|
|
(22,373 |
) |
|
|
(12,427 |
) |
Proceeds from Asset Dispositions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
Purchase of Illinois Cement 50% J.V. Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
(72,929 |
) |
|
|
(92,991 |
) |
|
|
(11,687 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess Tax Benefits from Share Based Payment Arrangements |
|
|
1,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Note Payable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
|
24,100 |
|
Repayment of Note Payable |
|
|
(30,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,257 |
) |
Proceeds from Long-term Debt |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
92,000 |
|
Repayment of Long-term Debt |
|
|
(54,000 |
) |
|
|
(58,780 |
) |
|
|
(88,380 |
) |
Redemption of Subordinated Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(510 |
) |
Dividends Paid to Stockholders |
|
|
(21,312 |
) |
|
|
(22,203 |
) |
|
|
(116,580 |
) |
Retirement of Common Stock |
|
|
(165,335 |
) |
|
|
(43,754 |
) |
|
|
(3,137 |
) |
Proceeds from Stock Option Exercises |
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
|
3,511 |
|
|
|
13,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities |
|
|
(67,772 |
) |
|
|
(60,526 |
) |
|
|
(104,257 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
47,545 |
|
|
|
3,685 |
|
|
|
(3,259 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
7,221 |
|
|
|
3,536 |
|
|
|
6,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
54,766 |
|
|
$ |
7,221 |
|
|
$ |
3,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
39
Eagle Materials Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Common Stock - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period |
|
$ |
547 |
|
|
$ |
564 |
|
|
$ |
552 |
|
Retirement of Common Stock |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Exercises |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period |
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital In Excess of Par Value - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,847 |
|
|
|
13,864 |
|
Retirement of Common Stock |
|
|
(7,361 |
) |
|
|
(33,606 |
) |
|
|
(3,137 |
) |
Share Based Activity |
|
|
5,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Exercises |
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
|
5,759 |
|
|
|
17,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period |
|
|
487,220 |
|
|
|
413,079 |
|
|
|
467,481 |
|
Retirement of Common Stock |
|
|
(157,928 |
) |
|
|
(10,506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Stockholders |
|
|
(24,637 |
) |
|
|
(22,040 |
) |
|
|
(121,303 |
) |
Net Earnings |
|
|
160,984 |
|
|
|
106,687 |
|
|
|
66,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period |
|
|
465,639 |
|
|
|
487,220 |
|
|
|
413,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized Restricted Stock - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period |
|
|
(557 |
) |
|
|
(591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transfer to Capital in Excess of Par Value |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Restricted Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(709 |
) |
Amortization |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(557 |
) |
|
|
(591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Losses - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period |
|
|
(1,842 |
) |
|
|
(1,877 |
) |
|
|
(2,282 |
) |
Unrealized Gain on Hedging Instruments, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
579 |
|
Minimum Pension Liability, net of tax |
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period |
|
|
(1,404 |
) |
|
|
(1,842 |
) |
|
|
(1,877 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
464,738 |
|
|
$ |
485,368 |
|
|
$ |
439,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
40
Eagle Materials Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(A) Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Eagle Materials Inc. and its
majority-owned subsidiaries (EXP or the
Company), which may be referred to as
our, we or us.
All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. EXP is a holding company whose
assets consist of its investments in its subsidiaries, joint ventures, intercompany balances and
holdings of cash and cash equivalents. The businesses of the consolidated group are conducted
through EXPs subsidiaries. The Company conducts one of its cement plant operations through a
joint venture, Texas Lehigh Cement Company L.P., which is located in Buda, Texas (the Joint
Venture). Investments in Joint Ventures and affiliated companies owned 50% or less are accounted
for using the equity method of accounting. The Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
has been included for the same period as the Companys March 31 year end. As discussed further in
Note (I) the Company completed the purchase of the other 50% of Illinois Cement Company on January
10, 2005 and amounts reflected herein include the operational results of Illinois Cement Company
from that date forward.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents include short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of
three months or less, and are recorded at cost, which approximates market value.
Accounts and Notes Receivable
Accounts and notes receivable have been shown net of the allowance for doubtful accounts of
$3.3 million and $3.6 million at March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company performs
ongoing credit evaluations of its customers financial condition and generally requires no
collateral from its customers. The allowance for non-collection of receivables is based upon
analysis of economic trends in the construction industry, detailed analysis of the expected
collectibility of accounts receivable that are past due and the expected collectibility of overall
receivables. The Company has no significant credit risk concentration among its diversified
customer base.
Notes receivable at March 31, 2006 are collectible primarily over three years. The
weighted-average interest rate at March 31, 2006 and 2005 was 4.5% and 7.8%, respectively.
41
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of average cost (including applicable material, labor,
depreciation, and plant overhead) or market. Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Raw Materials and Materials-in-Progress |
|
$ |
15,494 |
|
|
$ |
16,073 |
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
|
6,621 |
|
|
|
8,668 |
|
Finished Cement |
|
|
10,978 |
|
|
|
5,680 |
|
Aggregates |
|
|
3,536 |
|
|
|
3,651 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
5,579 |
|
|
|
5,401 |
|
Repair Parts and Supplies |
|
|
23,962 |
|
|
|
22,414 |
|
Fuel and Coal |
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
67,799 |
|
|
$ |
63,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Major renewals and improvements are
capitalized and depreciated. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is
provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of depreciable assets.
Depreciation expense was $37.3 million, $33.7 million and $31.5 million for the years ended March
31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Raw material deposits are depleted as such deposits are
extracted for production utilizing the units-of-production method. Costs and accumulated
depreciation applicable to assets retired or sold are eliminated from the accounts and any
resulting gains or losses are recognized at such time. The estimated lives of the related assets
are as follows:
|
|
|
Plants
|
|
20 to 30 years |
Buildings
|
|
20 to 40 years |
Machinery and Equipment
|
|
3 to 20 years |
The Company periodically evaluates whether current events or circumstances indicate that
the carrying value of its depreciable assets may not be recoverable. At March 31, 2006 and 2005,
management believes no events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable.
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
The Company evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived assets and certain identifiable
intangibles for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the
carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the
asset. Such evaluations for impairment are significantly impacted by estimates of future prices
for the Companys products, capital needs, economic trends in the construction sector and other
factors. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured
by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value. Assets to be
disposed of by sale are reflected at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to
sell.
42
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill. Pursuant to SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is no
longer subject to amortization. Rather, goodwill is subject to at least an annual assessment for
impairment by applying a fair-value-based test. We have elected to test for goodwill impairment in
the first quarter of each calendar year. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process, which
requires management to make judgments in determining what assumptions to use in the calculation.
The first step of the process consists of estimating the fair value of each reporting unit based on
a discounted cash flow model using revenues and profit forecasts and comparing those estimated fair
values with the carrying value; a second step is performed, if necessary, to compute the amount of
the impairment by determining an implied fair value of goodwill. Similar to the review for
impairment of other long-lived assets, evaluations for impairment are significantly impacted by
estimates of future prices for our products, capital needs, economic trends and other factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer contracts |
|
|
15 years |
|
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
|
$ |
(463 |
) |
|
$ |
837 |
|
Permits |
|
|
40 years |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
(630 |
) |
|
|
21,370 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets and goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
68,947 |
|
|
$ |
(1,093 |
) |
|
$ |
67,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer contracts |
|
|
15 years |
|
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
|
$ |
(376 |
) |
|
$ |
924 |
|
Permits |
|
|
40 years |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
21,920 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets and goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
67,416 |
|
|
$ |
(456 |
) |
|
$ |
66,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense of intangibles for the years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was
$637,000, $167,000 and $87,000, respectively.
Other Assets
Other assets are primarily composed of prepaid assets, loan fees and financing costs, other
deferred expenses, and deposits.
Income Taxes
The Company provides for deferred taxes on the differences between the financial reporting
basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities using existing tax laws and rates. Additionally, as
applicable we recognize future tax benefits such as operating loss carry forwards, to the extent
that realization of such benefits is more likely than not.
Stock Repurchases
The Companys Board of Directors has approved a cumulative total of 26,453,805 shares for
repurchase. There are approximately 3,000,000 shares remaining under the Companys current
repurchase authorization at March 31, 2006. The Company repurchased and retired 4,547,163,
1,986,600 and 175,500
43
shares of Common Stock at a cost of $165.3 million, $43.8 million and $3.1 million during the years
ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from the sale of cement, gypsum wallboard, paperboard, concrete and aggregates is
recognized when title and ownership are transferred upon shipment to the customer. Fees for
shipping and handling are recorded as revenue, while costs incurred for shipping and handling are
recorded as expenses.
The Company classifies its freight revenue as sales and freight costs as cost of goods sold,
respectively. Approximately $112.0 million, $85.9 million and $72.3 million were classified as
cost of goods sold in the years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Comprehensive Income/Losses
A summary of comprehensive income for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
160,984 |
|
|
$ |
106,687 |
|
|
$ |
66,901 |
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gain on Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
579 |
|
Minimum Pension Liability Adjustments |
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
$ |
161,422 |
|
|
$ |
106,722 |
|
|
$ |
67,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unrealized gain on hedging instruments represents the deferral in other comprehensive
earnings of the unrealized loss on swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges. During fiscal
2004, the Company had an interest rate swap agreement with a bank for a total notional amount of
$55.0 million. This interest rate swap agreement expired on August 28, 2003 resulting in the
reversal of the comprehensive loss recorded at March 31, 2003, and such amounts were reclassified
to earnings. The accounting for interest rate swaps and other derivative financial instruments is
discussed in Note (P). The unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, are excluded from earnings and
reported in a separate component of stockholders equity as Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Losses.
As of March 31, 2006, the Company has an accumulated other comprehensive loss of $1.4 million
net of income taxes of $0.8 million, in connection with recognizing a minimum pension liability.
The minimum pension liability relates to the accumulated benefit obligation in excess of the fair
value of plan assets of the defined benefit retirement plans discussed in Note (N).
Statements of Consolidated Earnings Supplemental Disclosures
Selling, general and administrative expenses of the operating units are included in costs and
expenses of each segment. Corporate general and administrative expenses include administration,
financial, legal, employee benefits and other corporate activities not allocated to the segment and
are shown separately in the statements of consolidated earnings. Total selling, general and
administrative expenses for each of the periods are summarized as follows:
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Operating Units Selling G&A |
|
$ |
37,698 |
|
|
$ |
30,414 |
|
|
$ |
23,383 |
|
Corporate G&A |
|
|
16,370 |
|
|
|
10,280 |
|
|
|
9,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
54,068 |
|
|
$ |
40,694 |
|
|
$ |
32,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
G&A includes stock compensation expense. See Note (K) for more information.
Maintenance and repair expenses are included in each segments costs and expenses. The
Company incurred $58.5 million, $40.9 million and $38.9 million in the years ended March 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively.
Other net revenues include lease and rental income, asset sale income, non-inventoried
aggregates sales income, distribution center income and trucking income as well as other
miscellaneous revenue items and costs which have not been allocated to a business segment.
Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows Supplemental Disclosures
Interest payments made during the years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $4.0 million,
$2.4 million and $2.7 million, respectively.
The Company made net payments of $76.7 million, $32.4 million and $10.3 million for federal
and state income taxes in the years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Weighted-Average Shares of Common Stock Outstanding |
|
|
52,599,080 |
|
|
|
55,241,025 |
|
|
|
55,753,197 |
|
Common Equivalent Shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed Exercise of Outstanding Dilutive Options |
|
|
1,816,865 |
|
|
|
1,755,357 |
|
|
|
2,088,306 |
|
Less Shares Repurchased from Proceeds of Assumed Exercised Options(1) |
|
|
(1,142,793 |
) |
|
|
(1,127,793 |
) |
|
|
(1,633,308 |
) |
Restricted Shares |
|
|
57,152 |
|
|
|
14,685 |
|
|
|
909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Common and Common Equivalent Shares Outstanding |
|
|
53,330,304 |
|
|
|
55,883,274 |
|
|
|
56,209,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes unearned compensation related to outstanding stock options. |
There were 65,000 shares of stock at an average price of $42.85 that were excluded from
the computation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended March 31, 2004. There were no
anti-dilutive options for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005.
Accounting For Stock-Based Compensation
Share Based Payments. Effective April 1, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS 123R, Share-Based
Payment utilizing the modified prospective approach. Under the modified prospective approach,
SFAS 123R applies to new awards and to awards that were outstanding on April 1, 2005 and are
subsequently modified or cancelled. Compensation expense for outstanding awards for which the
requisite service had not been rendered as of April 1, 2005, is recognized over the remaining
service period using the compensation cost calculated for pro forma disclosure purposes previously
under SFAS 123 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Prior periods were not restated to
reflect the impact of adopting the new standard.
45
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R the Company accounted for employee stock options using the
intrinsic value method of accounting prescribed by APB Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, as allowed by SFAS 123.
In accordance with SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, the Company discloses
compensation cost based on the estimated fair value at the date of grant. For disclosure purposes
employee stock options are valued at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model
and compensation expense is recognized ratably over the vesting period. The weighted-average
assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model to value the option awards in fiscal 2005 and 2004,
respectively, are as follows: dividend yield of 1.2% and 0.50%; expected volatility of 26.5% and
31.7%; risk-free interest rates of 5.5% and 3.2%; and expected lives of 10 years for 2005 and 2004
grants.
If the Company had recognized compensation expense for the stock options plans based on the
fair value at the grant dates for awards, pro forma net earnings would be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Net Earnings - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
106,687 |
|
|
$ |
66,901 |
|
Add stock-based employee compensation included in the
determination of net income as reported, net of tax |
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Deduct fair value of stock-based employee compensation, net of tax |
|
|
(3,334 |
) |
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
104,444 |
|
|
$ |
66,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
1.93 |
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
1.91 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
1.87 |
|
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
Prior to adopting SFAS 123(R), all tax benefits of deductions resulting from the exercise
of nonqualified stock options were presented as operating cash flows (reflected in income taxes
payable). SFAS 123(R) requires the cash flows resulting from excess tax benefits be classified as
cash flows provided by financing activities. As a result of adopting FAS 123(R), excess tax
benefits have been classified as cash flows provided by financing activities.
New Accounting Standards
Inventory Costs. In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, an
amendment of APB No. 43, Chapter 4. The amendments made by SFAS No. 151 require that abnormal
amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) be
recognized as current-period charges and that the allocation of fixed production overheads to
inventory be based on the normal capacity of production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for
inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005, or fiscal 2007 for the
Company. The Company has evaluated the impact associated with the adoption of SFAS No. 151 and
believes that the adoption will not have a material impact on our financial position and results of
operations.
46
SFAS No. 109-1. In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) SFAS No. 109-1
Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on
Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. This FSP,
which became effective upon issuance, provides that the tax deduction for income with respect to qualified
domestic production activities, as part of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 that was enacted
on October 22, 2004, will be treated as a special deduction as described in SFAS No. 109. As a
result, this deduction has no effect on our deferred tax assets and liabilities existing at the
date of enactment. Instead, the impact of this deduction, which was effective January 1, 2005, will
be reported in the period or periods in which the deduction is claimed on our income tax returns.
EITF 04-6. During March 2005 the Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus that
stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a mine are variable production costs that
should be included in the costs of inventory produced during the period such costs are incurred.
The consensus is effective for the Company beginning April 1, 2006, and application of the Issue is
not expected to have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations.
Reclassifications -
Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to be consistent with the fiscal 2006
presentation.
(B) Stock Reclassification
On April 11, 2006, the shareholders of the Company voted to eliminate our dual class capital
structure by exchanging each share of our outstanding Common Stock and Class B Common Stock into a
new class of common stock. Accordingly, all stock information has been retroactively restated
as if the combination had taken place as of the earliest period presented.
(C) Stock Split
On January 24, 2006, the Board of Directors declared a 3-for-1 stock split in the form of a
200% stock dividend on the Companys Common Stock and its Class B Common Stock. The stock dividend
was distributed on February 24, 2006 to stockholders of record on February 10, 2006. All share and
per share information, including dividends, for the years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 has
been retroactively adjusted for this split.
(D) Spin-Off by Centex Corporation
In January 2004, the Company and Centex Corporation (Centex) completed a series of
transactions that resulted in the spin-off by Centex of its entire equity interest in the Company
(the Spin-off). As a result of the Spin-off, the Company is no longer affiliated with Centex.
On January 29, 2004, in connection with the Spin-off, the Company paid a special one-time cash
dividend of $2.00 per share ($112.9 million total) to the holders of record of its common stock
(including Centex) as of January 13, 2004. The Company used borrowings under its credit facility
and cash on hand to fund the special dividend, and, consequently, immediately after payment of the
dividend, the Companys debt was $92.0 million.
47
(E) Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost by major category and accumulated depreciation are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Land and Quarries |
|
$ |
56,327 |
|
|
$ |
53,941 |
|
Plants |
|
|
734,853 |
|
|
|
710,394 |
|
Buildings, Machinery and Equipment |
|
|
31,813 |
|
|
|
24,112 |
|
Construction in Progress |
|
|
33,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
856,227 |
|
|
|
788,447 |
|
Accumulated Depreciation |
|
|
(298,665 |
) |
|
|
(264,088 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
557,562 |
|
|
$ |
524,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress relates primarily to our expansion of the Illinois Cement
Company facility. The expansion is expected to be completed during November 2006, and require
additional capital expenditures of approximately $25.8 million.
(F) Indebtedness
Notes Payable and Long-term Debt is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Senior Notes |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Debt, Due December 2009, Unsecured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
Less Current Maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-term Debt |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
54,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables Securitization Facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Notes Payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average interest rate of Senior Notes during fiscal 2006, and at March 31,
2006 was 5.4%.
The weighted-average interest rate of bank debt borrowings during fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004
was 4.2%, 2.9% and 2.3%, respectively. The interest rate on the bank debt was 0% at March 31, 2006
and 3.8% at March 31, 2005.
The weighted-average interest rate of the note payable borrowings during fiscal 2006, 2005 and
2004 was 3.9%, 2.2% and 1.4%, respectively. The interest rate on note payable debt was 0% and 1.5%
at March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The amount of accounts receivable pledged under the
receivables securitization program at March 31, 2005 was $62.4 million.
48
Maturities of long-term debt during the next five fiscal years are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Notes -
On November 15, 2005, we entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the Note Purchase
Agreement) related to our sale of $200 million of senior, unsecured notes, designated as Series
2005A Senior Notes (the Senior Notes) in a private placement transaction. The Senior Notes are
guaranteed by substantially all of the Companys subsidiaries. The Senior Notes were sold at par on
November 15, 2005 and were issued in three tranches, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Interest Rate |
Tranche A |
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
November 15, 2012 |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
Tranche B |
|
$ |
80,000 |
|
|
November 15, 2015 |
|
|
5.38 |
% |
Tranche C |
|
$ |
80,000 |
|
|
November 15, 2017 |
|
|
5.48 |
% |
Interest for each tranche of Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on the 15th day
of May and the 15th day of November of each year until all principal is paid for the
respective tranche.
Our obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement and the Senior Notes are equal in right of
payment with all other senior, unsecured debt of the Company, including our debt under the Bank
Credit Facility. The Note Purchase Agreement contains customary restrictive covenants, including
covenants that place limits on our ability to encumber our assets, to incur additional debt, to
sell assets, or to merge or consolidate with third parties, as well as certain cross covenants with
the Bank Credit Facility. The Company was in compliance with all financial ratios and tests at
March 31, 2006 and throughout the fiscal year.
Pursuant to a Subsidiary Guaranty Agreement, substantially all of our subsidiaries have
guaranteed the punctual payment of all principal, interest, and Make-Whole Amounts (as defined in
the Note Purchase Agreement) on the Senior Notes and the other payment and performance obligations
of the Company contained in the Senior Notes and in the Note Purchase Agreement. We are permitted,
at our option, to prepay from time to time at least 10% of the original aggregate principal amount
of the Senior Notes at 100% of the principal amount to be prepaid, together with interest accrued
on such amount to be prepaid to the date of payment, plus a Make-Whole Amount. The Make-Whole
Amount is computed by discounting the remaining scheduled payments of interest and principal of the
Senior Notes being prepaid at a discount rate equal to the sum of 50 basis points and the yield to
maturity of U.S. treasury securities having a maturity equal to the remaining average life of the
Senior Notes being prepaid.
Bank Debt -
On December 16, 2004, the Company amended its existing credit facility to increase the
facility amount from $250 million to $350 million, modified certain financial and other covenants
and extended the maturity date to 2009 (the Bank Credit Facility). The Bank Credit Facility
expires on December 16, 2009, at which time all borrowings outstanding are due. The borrowings
under the Bank Credit Facility are guaranteed
49
by all major operating subsidiaries of the Company. At the option of the Company, outstanding
principal amounts on the Bank Credit Facility bear interest at a variable rate equal to: (i) LIBOR,
plus an agreed margin (ranging from 87.5 to 162.5 basis points), which is to be established
quarterly based upon the Companys ratio of consolidated EBITDA to its consolidated indebtedness;
or (ii) an alternate base rate which is the higher of (a) the prime rate or (b) the federal funds
rate plus 1/2% per annum, plus an agreed margin (ranging from 25 to 100 basis points). Interest
payments are payable monthly or at the end of the LIBOR advance periods, which can be up to a
period of six months at the option of the Company. Under the Bank Credit Facility, we are required
to adhere to a number of financial and other covenants, including covenants relating to the
Companys interest coverage ratio and consolidated funded indebtedness ratio. The Company was in
compliance with all financial ratios and tests at March 31, 2006 and throughout the fiscal year.
At March 31, 2006 the Company had $342.1 million of borrowings available under the Bank Credit
Facility.
The Credit Facility has a $25 million letter of credit facility. Under the letter of credit
facility, the Company pays a fee at a per annum rate equal to the applicable margin for Eurodollar
loans in effect from time to time plus a one-time letter of credit fee in an amount equal to 0.125%
of the initial stated amount. At March 31, 2006, the Company had $7.9 million of letters of credit
outstanding.
Prior to December 15, 2004, the Company maintained a $250 million credit agreement (the Prior
Credit Facility) with a scheduled maturity of December 18, 2006. The borrowings under the Prior
Credit Facility were guaranteed by all major operating subsidiaries of the Company. At the option
of the Company, outstanding principal amounts on the Prior Credit Facility bore interest at a
variable rate equal to: (i) LIBOR, plus an agreed margin (ranging from 125 to 200 basis points),
which is to be established quarterly based upon the Companys ratio of consolidated EBITDA to its
consolidated indebtedness; or (ii) an alternate base rate which is the higher of (a) the prime rate
or (b) the federal funds rate plus 1/2% per annum, plus an agreed margin (ranging from 25 to 100
basis points). Interest payments are payable monthly or at the end of the LIBOR advance periods,
which can be up to a period of six months at the option of the Company. Under the Prior Credit
Facility, the Company was required to adhere to a number of financial and other covenants,
including covenants relating to the Companys interest coverage ratio, consolidated funded
indebtedness ratio and minimum tangible net worth.
Receivables Securitization Facility
On February 20, 2004, the Company entered into a $50 million trade receivable securitization
facility (the Receivables Securitization Facility), which was funded through the issuance of
commercial paper and backed by a 364-day committed bank liquidity arrangement. The Receivables
Securitization Facility had a termination date of February 20, 2007, subject to a 364-day bank
commitment. The Receivables Securitization Facility was fully consolidated on the balance sheet.
Subsidiary company receivables were sold on a revolving basis first to the Company and then to a
wholly owned special purpose bankruptcy remote entity of the Company. This entity pledged the
receivables as security for advances under the facility. The purpose of the Receivables
Securitization Facility was to obtain financing at a lower interest rate by pledging accounts
receivable. The Company terminated the Receivables Securitization Facility on December 9, 2005.
50
(G) Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes includes the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Current Provision - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
73,341 |
|
|
$ |
31,178 |
|
|
$ |
12,549 |
|
State |
|
|
5,853 |
|
|
|
2,282 |
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,194 |
|
|
|
33,460 |
|
|
|
13,396 |
|
Deferred Provision - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
19,359 |
|
|
|
20,325 |
|
State |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
(1,417 |
) |
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
17,942 |
|
|
|
21,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
$ |
80,082 |
|
|
$ |
51,402 |
|
|
$ |
35,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rates vary from the federal statutory rates due to the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
$ |
241,066 |
|
|
$ |
158,089 |
|
|
$ |
102,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes at Statutory Rate |
|
$ |
84,373 |
|
|
$ |
55,331 |
|
|
$ |
35,743 |
|
Increases (Decreases) in Tax Resulting from - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State Income Taxes, net |
|
|
3,972 |
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
1,526 |
|
Statutory Depletion in Excess of Cost |
|
|
(4,544 |
) |
|
|
(3,955 |
) |
|
|
(3,148 |
) |
Domestic Production Activities Deduction |
|
|
(2,281 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(1,438 |
) |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
$ |
80,082 |
|
|
$ |
51,402 |
|
|
$ |
35,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Tax Rate |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
The deferred income tax provision results from the following temporary differences in the
recognition of revenues and expenses for tax and financial reporting purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Excess Tax Depreciation and Amortization |
|
$ |
3,458 |
|
|
$ |
8,885 |
|
|
$ |
10,134 |
|
Net Operating Loss Carryover |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,115 |
|
Bad Debts |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
7,394 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
Uniform Capitalization |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Accrual Changes |
|
|
(666 |
) |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
(1,566 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(1,914 |
) |
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
888 |
|
|
$ |
17,942 |
|
|
$ |
21,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
Components of deferred income taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Items Giving Rise to Deferred Tax Liabilities - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess Tax Depreciation and Amortization |
|
$ |
133,624 |
|
|
$ |
129,661 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,923 |
|
|
|
6,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,547 |
|
|
|
136,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items Giving Rise to Deferred Tax Assets - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual Changes |
|
|
(15,340 |
) |
|
|
(14,594 |
) |
Bad Debts |
|
|
(2,119 |
) |
|
|
(2,210 |
) |
Uniform Capitalization |
|
|
(609 |
) |
|
|
(534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,068 |
) |
|
|
(17,338 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deferred Income Tax Liability |
|
$ |
119,479 |
|
|
$ |
118,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2004, the Company fully utilized its regular and alternative minimum tax
carryovers from fiscal 2002. In fiscal 2005, the Company offset all of its $4.7 million
alternative minimum tax credit carryover against its regular tax liability.
(H) Business Segments
We operate in four business segments: Gypsum Wallboard, Cement, Recycled Paperboard, and
Concrete and Aggregates, with Gypsum Wallboard and Cement being our principal lines of business.
These operations are conducted in the U.S. and include the mining of gypsum and the manufacture
and sale of gypsum wallboard, the mining of limestone and the manufacture, production, distribution
and sale of Portland cement (a basic construction material which is the essential binding
ingredient in concrete), the manufacture and sale of recycled paperboard to the gypsum wallboard
industry and other paperboard converters, the sale of readymix concrete and the mining and sale of
aggregates (crushed stone, sand and gravel). These products are used primarily in commercial and
residential construction, public construction projects and projects to build, expand and repair
roads and highways.
As further discussed below, we operate five gypsum wallboard reload centers, a gypsum
wallboard distribution center, four cement plants, ten cement distribution terminals, four gypsum
wallboard plants, a recycled paperboard mill, eight readymix concrete batch plant locations and two
aggregates processing plant locations. The principal markets for our cement products are Texas,
northern Illinois (including Chicago), the Rocky Mountains, northern Nevada, and northern
California. Gypsum wallboard and recycled paperboard are distributed throughout the continental
U.S. Concrete and aggregates are sold to local readymix producers and paving contractors in the
Austin, Texas area and northern California.
During the periods covered by this report up to January 10, 2005, we conducted two out of four
of our cement plant operations through joint ventures, Texas Lehigh Cement Company L.P., which is
located in Buda, Texas and Illinois Cement Company, which is located in LaSalle, Illinois
(collectively, the Joint Ventures). For segment reporting purposes only, we proportionately
consolidate our 50% share of the cement Joint Ventures revenues and operating earnings, which is
consistent with the way management organizes the segments within the Company for making operating
decisions and assessing performance. On January 11, 2005 we completed the purchase of the
remaining 50% interest in Illinois Cement Company and, accordingly, the results of Illinois Cement
Company have been consolidated into our results from January 11, 2005 through March 31, 2005, and
all of fiscal 2006. See Note (I) Purchase of Illinois Cement Joint Venture for further
discussion.
52
The Company accounts for inter-segment sales at market prices. The following table sets forth
certain financial information relating to the Companys operations by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Revenues - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
479,134 |
|
|
$ |
350,101 |
|
|
$ |
272,924 |
|
Cement |
|
|
285,289 |
|
|
|
211,343 |
|
|
|
181,846 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
133,482 |
|
|
|
125,184 |
|
|
|
112,366 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
89,778 |
|
|
|
70,786 |
|
|
|
63,117 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
2,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
989,962 |
|
|
|
757,607 |
|
|
|
632,495 |
|
Less: Intersegment Revenues |
|
|
(65,096 |
) |
|
|
(58,812 |
) |
|
|
(53,567 |
) |
Less: Joint Venture Revenues |
|
|
(65,164 |
) |
|
|
(82,254 |
) |
|
|
(76,306 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
859,702 |
|
|
$ |
616,541 |
|
|
$ |
502,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Intersegment Revenues - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cement |
|
$ |
6,146 |
|
|
$ |
3,609 |
|
|
$ |
3,290 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
57,546 |
|
|
|
54,108 |
|
|
|
49,256 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,096 |
|
|
$ |
58,812 |
|
|
$ |
53,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cement Sales Volumes (M tons) - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly Owned |
|
|
2,381 |
|
|
|
1,566 |
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
Joint Ventures |
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
2,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Operating Earnings (Loss) - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
154,227 |
|
|
$ |
81,616 |
|
|
$ |
35,604 |
|
Cement |
|
|
78,311 |
|
|
|
57,616 |
|
|
|
50,450 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
20,087 |
|
|
|
25,406 |
|
|
|
20,942 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
9,613 |
|
|
|
7,742 |
|
|
|
5,971 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
(721 |
) |
|
|
2,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-Total |
|
|
263,777 |
|
|
|
171,659 |
|
|
|
115,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate General and Administrative |
|
|
(16,370 |
) |
|
|
(10,280 |
) |
|
|
(9,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Interest and Income Taxes |
|
|
247,407 |
|
|
|
161,379 |
|
|
|
105,937 |
|
Interest Expense, net |
|
|
(6,341 |
) |
|
|
(3,290 |
) |
|
|
(3,814 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
$ |
241,066 |
|
|
$ |
158,089 |
|
|
$ |
102,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cement Operating Earnings - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly Owned |
|
$ |
51,394 |
|
|
$ |
30,694 |
|
|
$ |
26,539 |
|
Joint Ventures |
|
|
26,917 |
|
|
|
26,922 |
|
|
|
23,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
78,311 |
|
|
$ |
57,616 |
|
|
$ |
50,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable Assets (1) - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
335,985 |
|
|
$ |
331,367 |
|
|
$ |
327,137 |
|
Cement |
|
|
257,976 |
|
|
|
212,022 |
|
|
|
133,165 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
179,776 |
|
|
|
181,854 |
|
|
|
184,447 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
46,799 |
|
|
|
37,135 |
|
|
|
33,603 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
68,380 |
|
|
|
17,623 |
|
|
|
14,623 |
|
|
|
$ |
888,916 |
|
|
$ |
780,001 |
|
|
$ |
692,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures (1) - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
3,271 |
|
|
$ |
5,791 |
|
|
$ |
8,208 |
|
Cement |
|
|
48,175 |
|
|
|
8,509 |
|
|
|
1,834 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
4,936 |
|
|
|
4,502 |
|
|
|
1,263 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
11,110 |
|
|
|
3,467 |
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
5,437 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,929 |
|
|
$ |
22,373 |
|
|
$ |
12,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
$ |
16,755 |
|
|
$ |
16,923 |
|
|
$ |
15,571 |
|
Cement |
|
|
9,955 |
|
|
|
6,064 |
|
|
|
5,039 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
8,075 |
|
|
|
8,026 |
|
|
|
7,808 |
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
|
2,986 |
|
|
|
2,810 |
|
|
|
2,982 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
1,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38,599 |
|
|
$ |
34,496 |
|
|
$ |
33,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Basis conforms with equity method accounting. |
54
Segment operating earnings, including the proportionately consolidated 50% interest in
the revenues and expenses of the Joint Venture(s), represent revenues less direct operating
expenses, segment depreciation, and segment selling, general and administrative expenses. The
Company accounts for intersegment sales at market prices. Corporate assets consist primarily of
cash and cash equivalents, general office assets and miscellaneous other assets. The segment
breakdown of goodwill at March 31, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Cement |
|
$ |
5,359 |
|
|
$ |
3,826 |
|
Gypsum Wallboard |
|
|
37,842 |
|
|
|
37,844 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
2,446 |
|
|
|
2,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,647 |
|
|
$ |
44,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined summarized financial information for the Joint Venture that is not consolidated
is set out below (this combined summarized financial information includes the total combined
amounts for the Joint Venture and not the Companys 50% interest in those amounts). As discussed
previously, amounts reflected for fiscal 2004 and through January 10, 2005 included the results of
Illinois Cement; however as of January 11, 2005 Illinois Cement became a wholly-owned subsidiary of
the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
138,331 |
|
|
$ |
170,223 |
|
|
$ |
158,002 |
|
Gross Margin |
|
$ |
57,637 |
|
|
$ |
59,750 |
|
|
$ |
54,439 |
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
$ |
53,833 |
|
|
$ |
53,844 |
|
|
$ |
47,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Current Assets |
|
$ |
36,056 |
|
|
$ |
33,979 |
|
Non-Current Assets |
|
$ |
29,104 |
|
|
$ |
32,022 |
|
Current Liabilities |
|
$ |
10,503 |
|
|
$ |
10,293 |
|
(I) Purchase of Illinois Cement Joint Venture
On January 11, 2005 we completed the purchase of the other 50% interest in Illinois Cement
Company Joint Venture for approximately $72 million in cash. An additional $3 million cash payment
is due upon commencement prior to January 11, 2010 of commercial production of an expanded Illinois
Cement. We anticipate that the expansion of the Illinois Cement Company plant, and related startup
will occur during fiscal 2007. Upon payment, the additional $3 million will be recorded as an
adjustment to the purchase price through goodwill.
55
The allocation of the purchase price to the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed is summarized below (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable, Inventories, and Other Current Assets |
|
$ |
6,493 |
|
Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment |
|
|
42,138 |
|
Intangible Assets permits |
|
|
22,000 |
|
Goodwill (tax deductible) |
|
|
5,359 |
|
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
(3,990 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
(J) Commitments and Contingencies
The Company, in the ordinary course of business, has various litigation, commitments and
contingencies. Management believes that none of the litigation in which it or any subsidiary is
currently involved, is likely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial
condition or results of operations of the Company.
The Companys operations and properties are subject to extensive and changing federal, state
and local laws, regulations and ordinances governing the protection of the environment, as well as
laws relating to worker health and workplace safety. The Company carefully considers the
requirements mandated by such laws and regulations and has procedures in place at all of its
operating units to monitor compliance. Any matters which are identified as potential exposures
under these laws and regulations are carefully reviewed by management to determine the Companys
potential liability. Although management is not aware of any exposures which would require an
accrual under generally accepted accounting principles, there can be no assurance that prior or
future operations will not ultimately result in violations, claims or other liabilities associated
with these regulations.
The Companys tax returns are subject to periodic examination by the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) and State Taxing Authorities. At March 31, 2006, the IRS was in the process of conducting
an audit of the Companys tax returns. We expect the IRS to complete its audit during fiscal 2007.
The Company has certain deductible limits under its workers compensation and liability
insurance policies for which reserves are established based on the undiscounted estimated costs of
known and anticipated claims. The Company has entered into standby letter of credit agreements
relating to workers compensation and auto and general liability self-insurance. At March 31,
2006, the Company had contingent liabilities under these outstanding letters of credit of
approximately $7.9 million.
The following table compares insurance accruals and payments for the Companys operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Accrual Balances at Beginning Period |
|
$ |
4,905 |
|
|
$ |
3,883 |
|
Insurance Expense Accrued |
|
|
4,603 |
|
|
|
3,655 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(4,052 |
) |
|
|
(3,567 |
) |
Acquired from Illinois Cement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual Balance at End of Period |
|
$ |
5,456 |
|
|
$ |
4,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
The Company is currently contingently liable for performance under $6.9 million in
performance bonds required by certain states and municipalities, and their related agencies. The
bonds are principally for certain reclamation obligations and mining permits. The Company has
indemnified the underwriting insurance company against any exposure under the performance bonds.
In the Companys past experience, no material claims have been made against these financial
instruments.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company executes contracts involving indemnifications
standard in the industry and indemnifications specific to a transaction such as sale of a business.
These indemnifications might include claims relating to any of the following: environmental and
tax matters; intellectual property rights; governmental regulations and employment-related matters;
customer, supplier, construction contractor and other commercial contractual relationships; and
financial matters. While the maximum amount to which the Company may be exposed under such
agreements cannot be estimated, it is the opinion of management that these indemnifications are not
expected to have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or
results of operations. The Company currently has no outstanding guarantees of third party debt.
The Companys paperboard operation, Republic Paperboard Company LLC (Republic), is a party
to a long-term paper supply agreement with St. Gobain pursuant to which Republic is obligated to
sell to St. Gobain 95% of the gypsum-grade recycled paperboard requirements for three of St.
Gobains wallboard plants. This amounts to approximately 35% to 40% of Republics output of
gypsum-grade recycled paperboard.
The Company has certain operating leases covering manufacturing, transportation and certain
other facilities and equipment. Rental expense for fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004 totaled $2.4
million, $2.9 million and $2.8 million, respectively. Minimum annual rental commitments as of
March 31, 2006, under noncancellable leases are set forth as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Total |
2007 |
|
$ |
2,008 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
1,617 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
466 |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
466 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
431 |
|
Thereafter |
|
$ |
4,044 |
|
(K) Stock Option Plans
The Company accounts for its stock option plans under FAS 123(R) and the associated
interpretations. Pro-forma footnote disclosure in accordance with SFAS 148 is presented in Note
(A) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
Prior to January 2004, the Company had two stock option plans for certain directors, officers
and key employees of the Company: the Eagle Materials Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan
(the 1994 Plan) and the Eagle Materials Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan (the 2000 Plan). Although
the 1994 Plan and the 2000 Plan provided that option grants may be at less than fair market value
at the date of grant, the Company consistently followed the practice of issuing options at or above
fair market value at the date of grant. Under both plans, option periods and exercise dates may
vary within a maximum period of 10 years. Until fiscal 2005, nearly all option grants have been
issued with vesting occurring near the end of the option grants 10-year life; however, the option
grants may qualify for early vesting, on an annual basis, if certain predetermined performance
criteria are met. The Company records proceeds from the exercise of options as additions to common
stock and capital in excess of par value. The federal tax benefit, if any, is considered
57
additional capital in excess of par value. No charges or credits would be made to earnings
unless options were to be granted at less than fair market value at the date of grant.
On January 8, 2004, the Companys stockholders approved a new incentive plan (the Plan) that
is a combined amendment and restatement of the two existing stock option plans discussed above.
The number of shares available for issuance under the Plan has not increased from, and is the same
as, the total combined number of shares available for issuance under the two stock plans listed
above.
Long-Term Compensation Plans
Options. During the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company granted a target number of stock
options to certain individuals that would be earned, in whole or in part, by meeting certain
performance conditions related to both financial and operational performance. These stock options
were valued at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted-average
assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model to value the option awards in fiscal 2006 are as
follows: dividend yield of 1.2 %, expected volatility of 23%, risk free interest rate of 4.1% and
expected life of 7 years. At the end of fiscal 2006, one third of the options earned became
immediately vested, with the remaining options vesting ratably on March 31, 2007 and 2008. The
Company is expensing the fair value of the options granted over a three year period, as adjusted
for forfeitures. For the year ended March 31, 2006, we expensed approximately $1.9 million. At
March 31, 2006 there was approximately $5.4 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to
outstanding stock options which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.9
years.
Options granted in fiscal 2005 are earned based on the achievement of certain performance
conditions, with one third exercisable when earned and the rest becoming exercisable ratably over a
two year period subsequent to vesting. Prior to the adoption of FAS 123(R) on April 1, 2005, these
awards were determined to be variable awards and related expense was being recognized over the
associated performance period based on the intrinsic value of the options deemed probable of
vesting, measured at each quarter and year-end. For the year ended March 31, 2005, we expensed
approximately $406,000. No such costs were incurred in the previous corresponding periods.
The following table represents stock option activity for the years presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Number |
|
Average |
|
Number |
|
Average |
|
Number |
|
Average |
|
|
of |
|
Exercise |
|
of |
|
Exercise |
|
of |
|
Exercise |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Shares |
|
Price |
Outstanding Options at
Beginning of Year |
|
|
1,755,357 |
|
|
$ |
12.57 |
|
|
|
1,885,380 |
|
|
$ |
10.43 |
|
|
|
2,818,734 |
|
|
$ |
10.75 |
|
Granted |
|
|
346,191 |
|
|
$ |
30.84 |
|
|
|
279,600 |
|
|
$ |
23.01 |
|
|
|
391,500 |
|
|
$ |
13.30 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(175,156 |
) |
|
$ |
11.49 |
|
|
|
(409,623 |
) |
|
$ |
9.82 |
|
|
|
(1,297,320 |
) |
|
$ |
10.35 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(109,527 |
) |
|
$ |
19.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(208,746 |
) |
|
$ |
11.59 |
|
Modification(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options at
End of Year |
|
|
1,816,865 |
|
|
$ |
15.74 |
|
|
|
1,755,357 |
|
|
$ |
12.57 |
|
|
|
1,885,380 |
|
|
$ |
10.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable at
End of Year |
|
|
1,225,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,402,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
997,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Fair
Value of Options Granted
during the Year |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5.59 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In connection with the Spin-off, in order to ensure that the economic value of
outstanding stock options was preserved, but not increased, a modification was made to the number
of shares and their exercise price so that the awards intrinsic value immediately after the
modification was not greater than its intrinsic value immediately before and the ratio of exercise
price per share to market value per share was not reduced. |
58
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at March 31,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Contractual |
|
Exercise |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise |
|
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Life |
|
Price |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Price |
|
$6.80 - $8.15 |
|
|
343,242 |
|
|
4.6 years |
|
$ |
7.35 |
|
|
|
308,016 |
|
|
$ |
7.26 |
|
|
$9.57 - $10.54 |
|
|
219,765 |
|
|
3.6 years |
|
$ |
10.29 |
|
|
|
205,035 |
|
|
$ |
10.33 |
|
|
$11.04 - $18.88 |
|
|
695,837 |
|
|
5.8 years |
|
$ |
12.08 |
|
|
|
504,899 |
|
|
$ |
12.01 |
|
|
$21.52 - $29.59 |
|
|
474,030 |
|
|
8.7 years |
|
$ |
26.01 |
|
|
|
160,314 |
|
|
$ |
22.96 |
|
|
$34.67 - $39.54 |
|
|
83,991 |
|
|
9.4 years |
|
$ |
36.60 |
|
|
|
47,691 |
|
|
$ |
35.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,816,865 |
|
|
6.2 years |
|
$ |
15.74 |
|
|
|
1,225,955 |
|
|
$ |
12.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2006 the aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding was
approximately $87.1 million. The aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable stock options at that
date was approximately $62.4 million.
During the year ended March 31, 2006, the total intrinsic value of options exercised was
approximately $4.9 million.
Restricted Stock Units. Below is a summary of restricted stock units awarded by the Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awarded |
|
Earned |
|
Vested |
|
Unearned |
2004 |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
51,951 |
|
|
|
51,951 |
|
|
|
34,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
70,895 |
|
|
|
55,046 |
|
|
|
18,349 |
|
|
|
15,849 |
|
During fiscal 2005 and 2006, the Company granted a target level of restricted stock units to
employees during the first quarter of the fiscal year. The ultimate number of restricted stock
units earned from the grant was based on the achievement of certain criteria during the fiscal
year, similar to the stock option grants described above. Unearned shares are treated as
forfeitures. The value of the shares granted is being amortized over five and three year periods,
respectively. Expense related to restricted stock units was $910,000, $969,000 and $101,000 in
fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. At March 31, 2006 there was approximately $2.7
million of unrecognized compensation cost from restricted stock units that will be recognized over
a weighted-average period of 2.5 years.
Shares available for future stock option and restricted stock unit grants were 1,375,476 at
March 31, 2006. During fiscal 2004, the Company issued 45,000 shares of restricted stock pursuant
to the Plan. The restricted shares have a seven year vesting period and the value of the shares is
being amortized over the term of the grant.
(L) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of the Companys long-term debt has been estimated based upon the Companys
current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The carrying
value of the Companys Senior Notes at March 31, 2006 is as follows:
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Tranche A |
|
$ |
39,197 |
|
Tranche B |
|
|
77,717 |
|
Tranche C |
|
|
77,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
194,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
All assets and liabilities which are not considered financial instruments have been valued
using historical cost accounting. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and
notes receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to the
short-term maturities of these assets and liabilities.
(M) Agreements with Centex Corporation
On January 30, 2004, the Spin-off of all of the Company shares owned by Centex was completed.
At the time of the Spin-off, the Company entered into the following agreements with Centex:
Administrative Services: In connection with the January 2004 Spin-off from Centex, the
Company entered into an amended and restated administrative services agreement with Centex Service
Company (CSC) that amended and restated a similar agreement with Centex entered into in 1994.
The Company paid CSC a fee of $16,750 per month for such services and reimbursed CSC for its
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the performance of such services. The
administrative services agreement expired on December 31, 2005.
Intellectual Property: Under the terms of the intellectual property agreement, Centex granted
to the Company an exclusive, perpetual and royalty-free license to use all trademarks held by
Centex which relate primarily or exclusively to the Companys business.
Tax Matters: In connection with the Spin-off from Centex, the Company has agreed to certain
undertakings, including that, for a period of two years after the date of the distribution of
Common Stock by Centex, it will maintain its status as a company engaged in the active conduct of a
trade or business, and will take no action to facilitate certain acquisitions of the Companys
stock. In addition, under Section 335(e) of the Internal Revenue Code, the distribution will be
taxable to Centex if the distribution is part of a plan or series of related transactions pursuant
to which one or more persons acquire directly or indirectly stock representing a 50% or greater
interest, based on either vote or value, in Centex or the Company. Acquisitions that occur during
the period beginning two years before the distribution and ending two years after the distribution
are subject to a rebuttable presumption that they are part of such a plan. If Centex becomes
subject to tax under Section 355(e), its tax liability will be based upon the difference between
the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock at the time of the distribution and its
adjusted basis in such stock at that time and this tax liability will be a significant amount.
If the Company fails to comply with any such undertakings, or takes any other action or fails
to take any other required action, and that failure to comply, action or omission contributes to a
determination that the distribution fails to qualify as a tax free distribution, the Company will
be required to indemnify Centex and the other members of the Centex group for all federal, state
and local taxes, including any interest, penalty or
additions to tax, incurred or imposed upon Centex or any other members of the Centex group and for
any established tax liabilities of Centex stockholders resulting from the distribution.
60
(N) Pension and Profit Sharing Plans
The Company has several defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans which
together cover substantially all of its employees. The Company is not a party to any
multi-employer pension plan. Benefits paid under the defined benefit plans covering certain hourly
employees are based on years of service and the employees qualifying compensation over the last
few years of employment. The Companys funding policy is to generally contribute amounts that are
deductible for income tax purposes.
The annual measurement date is March 31 for the benefit obligations, fair value of plan assets
and the funded status of the defined benefit plans.
As of January 10, 2005, the Company completed the acquisition of the other 50% of Illinois
Cement Company Joint Venture further discussed in Note (I). In conjunction with the preliminary
purchase price allocation the Company recorded an approximate $791,000 liability associated with
the difference between the Illinois Cement Companys plans projected benefit obligation and the
fair value of plan assets at the date of acquisition.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the obligations and fair values of plan
assets for all of the Companys defined benefit plans over the two-year period ended March 31, 2006
and a statement of the funded status as of March 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Reconciliation of Benefit Obligations - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Obligation at April 1, |
|
$ |
13,411 |
|
|
$ |
7,936 |
|
Service Cost Benefits Earned During the Period |
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
Acquisition of Illinois Cement Joint Venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,791 |
|
Interest Cost on Projected Benefit Obligation |
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
Plan Amendments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
166 |
|
Actuarial Gain |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
Benefits Paid |
|
|
(386 |
) |
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Obligation at March 31, |
|
|
13,931 |
|
|
|
13,411 |
|
Reconciliation of Fair Value of Plan Assets - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Plan Assets at April 1, |
|
|
10,455 |
|
|
|
5,449 |
|
Actual Return on Plan Assets |
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
Acquisition of Illinois Cement Joint Venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
Employer Contributions |
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
Benefits Paid |
|
|
(386 |
) |
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Plans at March 31, |
|
|
12,246 |
|
|
|
10,455 |
|
Funded Status - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded Status at March 31, |
|
|
(1,685 |
) |
|
|
(2,956 |
) |
Unrecognized Loss from Past Experience Different than that Assumed and Effects
of Changes in Assumptions |
|
|
2,116 |
|
|
|
3,063 |
|
Unrecognized Prior-Service Cost |
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Amount Recognized |
|
$ |
1,060 |
|
|
$ |
876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Amounts Recognized in the Balance Sheet Consist of - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Benefit Liability |
|
$ |
(2,646 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,593 |
) |
Prepaid Benefit Cost |
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
Intangible Asset |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
|
2,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Amount Recognized |
|
$ |
1,060 |
|
|
$ |
876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated benefit obligation for the defined benefit pension plan was $13.7 million
and $13.2 million at March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Projected Benefit Obligation |
|
$ |
13,931 |
|
|
$ |
13,411 |
|
Accumulated Benefit Obligation |
|
$ |
13,667 |
|
|
$ |
13,172 |
|
Fair Value of Plan Assets |
|
$ |
12,246 |
|
|
$ |
10,455 |
|
Net periodic pension cost for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
included the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Service Cost Benefits Earned During the Period |
|
$ |
497 |
|
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
Interest Cost of Projected Benefit Obligation |
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
Expected Return on Plan Assets |
|
|
(842 |
) |
|
|
(529 |
) |
|
|
(286 |
) |
Recognized Net Actuarial Loss |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
Amortization of Prior-Service Cost |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Periodic Pension Cost |
|
$ |
802 |
|
|
$ |
708 |
|
|
$ |
855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the assumptions used in the actuarial calculations of the
present value of net periodic benefit cost and benefit obligations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net Periodic Benefit Costs - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount Rate |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
Expected Return on Plan Assets |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
Rate of Compensation Increase |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Benefit Obligations - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount Rate |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
Rate of Compensation Increase |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is an assumption reflecting the
anticipated weighted-average rate of earnings on the portfolio over the long-term. To arrive at
this rate, the Company developed estimates of the key components underlying capital asset returns
including: market-based estimates of inflation, real risk-free rates of return, yield curve
structure, credit risk premiums and equity risk premiums. As appropriate, these components were
used to develop benchmark estimates of the expected long-term management approach employed by the
Company, and a return premium was added to the weighted-average benchmark portfolio return.
The pension plans weighted-average asset allocation at March 31, 2006 and 2005 and the range
of target allocation are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of |
|
Percentage of Plan |
|
|
Target |
|
Assets at March 31, |
|
|
Allocation |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Asset Category - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Securities |
|
|
40 60 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
Debt Securities |
|
|
35 60 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
Other |
|
|
0 5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys pension investment strategies have been developed as part of a
comprehensive asset/liability management process that considers the interaction between both the
assets and liabilities of the plan. These strategies consider not only the expected risk and
returns on plan assets, but also the detailed actuarial projections of liabilities as well as
plan-level objectives such as projected contributions, expense and funded status.
The principal pension investment strategies include asset allocation and active asset
management. The range of target asset allocations have been determined after giving consideration
to the expected returns of each asset class, the expected variability or volatility of the asset
class returns over time, and the complementary nature or correlation of the asset classes within
the portfolio. The Company also employs an active management approach for the portfolio. Each
asset class is managed by one or more external money managers with the objective of generating
returns, net of management fees that exceed market-based benchmarks. None of the plans hold any
EXP stock.
The Company does not expect to contribute to its defined benefit plans during fiscal 2007.
The Company had at March 31, 2006, a minimum pension liability of $2.2 million related to the
accumulated benefit obligation in excess of the fair value of the
plan assets.
The Company also provides a profit sharing plan, which covers substantially all salaried and
certain hourly employees. The profit sharing plan is a defined contribution plan funded by
employer discretionary contributions and also allows employees to contribute on an after-tax basis
up to 10% of their base annual salary. Employees are fully vested to the extent of their
contributions and become fully vested in the
63
Companys contributions over a seven-year period.
Costs relating to the employer discretionary contributions
for the Companys defined contribution plan totaled $2.6 million, $2.4 million and $2.2
million in fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Employees who became employed by the Company as a result of a previous transaction are
provided benefits substantially comparable to those provided under the sellers welfare plans.
These welfare plans included the sellers 401(k) plan which included employer matching percentages.
As a result, the Company made matching contributions to its 401(k) plan totaling $0.1 million for
these employees during each of the fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004.
(O) Net Interest Expense
The following components are included in interest expense, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest Income |
|
$ |
(898 |
) |
|
$ |
(36 |
) |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
Interest Expense |
|
|
7,747 |
|
|
|
2,852 |
|
|
|
2,517 |
|
Interest Capitalized |
|
|
(1,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expenses |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense, net |
|
$ |
6,341 |
|
|
$ |
3,290 |
|
|
$ |
3,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income includes interest on investments of excess cash and interest on notes
receivable. Components of interest expense primarily include interest associated with the Prior
Credit Facility, the Bank Credit Facility, the Receivables Securitization Facility, the Senior
Notes and commitment fees based on the unused portion of the Prior Credit Facility and Bank Credit
Facility. Other expenses include amortization of debt issue costs and costs associated with the
Prior Credit Facility, the Bank Credit Facility, the Senior Notes and the Receivables
Securitization Facility.
(P) Hedging Activities
The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading purposes, but has
utilized them in the past to convert a portion of its variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt and to
manage its fixed to variable-rate debt ratio. All derivatives, whether designated in hedging
relationships or not, are required to be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. If the
derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portions of changes in the fair value
of the derivative are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) and are recognized in the
statement of earnings when the hedged item affects earnings. Ineffective portions of changes in
the fair value of cash flow hedges are immediately recognized in earnings.
During fiscal 2004, the Company had an interest rate swap agreement with a bank for a total
notional amount of $55.0 million. This agreement expired on August 28, 2003 and the amount recorded
in accumulated other comprehensive losses at March 31, 2003 was reclassified to earnings. The
Company currently is not a party to any interest rate swap agreement.
64
(Q) Stockholders Equity
On January 8, 2004, the Companys stockholders approved an amendment to the Companys
certificate of incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of capital stock that the
Company may issue from 50,000,000 shares of common stock and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock to
100,000,000 shares of common stock and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation became effective on January 30, 2004. The Companys Board of
Directors designated 40,000 shares of preferred stock for use in connection with the Rights Plan
discussed below. As discussed in Note B, the Company combined each share of its Common Stock (the
Common Stock).
Effective February 2, 2004, the Company entered into a Rights Agreement as amended and
restated on April 11, 2006 (as amended and restated, Rights Agreement) that was approved by
stockholders at the Special Meeting of Stockholders held on January 8, 2004. In connection with
the Rights Agreement, the Board authorized and declared a dividend of one right per share of Common
Stock. The Rights entitle the Companys stockholders to purchase Common Stock (the Rights) in
the event certain efforts are made to acquire control of the Company. There are no separate
certificates or market for the Rights.
The Rights are represented by and trade with the Companys Common Stock. The Rights will
separate from the Common Stock upon the earlier of: (1) a public announcement that a person has
acquired beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock representing in the aggregate 15% or more
of the total number of votes entitled to be cast generally by the holders of Common Stock then
outstanding, or (2) the commencement of a tender or exchange offer that would result in a person
beneficially owning shares of Common Stock representing in the aggregate 15% or more of the total
number of votes entitled to be cast generally by the holders of Common Stock then outstanding.
Should either of these conditions be met and the Rights become exercisable, each Right will entitle
the holder to buy 1/1,000th of a share of the Companys Preferred Stock at an exercise
price of $140.00. Each 1/1,000th of a share of the Preferred Stock will essentially be
the economic equivalent of three shares of Common Stock.
Under certain circumstances, the Rights entitle the holders to buy the Companys stock or
shares of the acquirers stock at a 50% discount. The Rights may be redeemed by the Company for
$0.001 per Right at any time prior to the first public announcement of the acquisition of
beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock representing 15% or more of the total number of
votes entitled to be cast generally by the holders of Common Stock then outstanding. If not
redeemed, the Rights will expire on January 7, 2014.
65
(R) Quarterly Results (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
First Quarter - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
204,798 |
|
|
$ |
150,291 |
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
50,182 |
|
|
|
35,434 |
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
34,908 |
|
|
|
23,213 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
Second Quarter - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
221,784 |
|
|
|
163,112 |
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
65,729 |
|
|
|
45,977 |
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
43,322 |
|
|
|
30,119 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
Third Quarter - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
211,515 |
|
|
|
149,802 |
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
58,866 |
|
|
|
37,935 |
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
38,987 |
|
|
|
25,867 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
Fourth Quarter - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
221,605 |
|
|
|
153,336 |
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
66,289 |
|
|
|
38,743 |
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
43,767 |
|
|
|
27,488 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
66
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Eagle Materials Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Eagle Materials Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements
of earnings, cash flows and stockholders equity, for each of the three years in the period ended
March 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at March 31,
2006 and 2005, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended March 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.
As discussed in Note A to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its
method of accounting for stock-based compensation effective April 1, 2005.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of March 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our
report dated May 25, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Dallas, Texas,
May 25, 2006
67
|
|
|
ITEM 9. |
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer
(CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as defined in Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 13a-15(e) as
of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on these evaluations, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or
submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported
within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
During the Companys fourth quarter, there were no significant changes in internal controls
over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal controls over financial reporting.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations.
Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance
with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of Eagle Materials Inc. (the Company) is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Companys internal control over financial
reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. The Companys internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; |
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that the transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and |
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a material effect
on the financial statements. |
Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to that risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Companys management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of March 31, 2006. In making this assessment, management used the criteria
set forth by
68
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control
Integrated Framework.
Based on its assessment using the COSO criteria, management believes that the Company
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting, as of
March 31, 2006.
The Companys independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report
on managements assessment of the Companys internal control over financial reporting, which
immediately follows this report.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Eagle Materials Inc.
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Management Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Eagle Materials Inc. and subsidiaries maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2006, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Eagle Materials Inc.s management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the
companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
69
In our opinion, managements assessment that Eagle Materials Inc. and subsidiaries maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Eagle Materials Inc. and
subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of March 31, 2006, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Eagle Materials Inc. as of
March 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, cash flows, and
stockholders equity for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2006 of Eagle
Materials Inc. and our report dated May 25, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Dallas, Texas
May 25, 2006
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Except for the information below regarding our code of ethics, the information called for by
Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the information included and
referenced under the following captions in the Companys Proxy Statement for the Companys July 27,
2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the 2006 EXP Proxy Statement):
|
|
|
Items |
|
Caption in the 2006 EXP Proxy Statement |
|
10
|
|
Named Executive Officers who are not Directors |
|
|
|
10
|
|
Election of Directors |
|
|
|
10
|
|
Stock Ownership-Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance |
|
|
|
11
|
|
Executive Compensation |
|
|
|
12
|
|
Stock Ownership |
|
|
|
13
|
|
Certain Transactions |
|
|
|
14
|
|
Relationship with Independent Public Accountants |
Code of Ethics. The policies comprising the Companys code of ethics (Eagle Ethics A Guide
to Decision Making on Business Conduct Issues) will represent both the code of ethics for the
principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer under
SEC rules, and the code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers, and employees under
NYSE listing standards. The code of ethics is published on the corporate governance section of the
Companys website at www.eaglematerials.com.
Although the Company does not envision that any waivers of the code of ethics will be granted,
should a waiver occur for the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, the
principal accounting officer or controller, it will be promptly disclosed on our internet site.
Also, any amendments of the code will be promptly posted on our internet site.
70
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
See Item 10 above.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
See Item 10 above.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The following table shows the number of outstanding options and shares available for future
issuance of options under all of the Companys equity compensation plans as of March 31, 2006.
All of the Companys equity compensation plans have been approved by the Companys shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
future issuance under |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities to |
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
equity compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
be issued upon exercise |
|
|
exercise price of |
|
|
plans excluding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of outstanding options, |
|
|
outstanding options, |
|
|
securities reflected in |
|
|
|
Incentive |
|
|
warrants and rights |
|
|
warrants and rights |
|
|
column (a) |
|
Plan Category |
|
Plan |
|
|
(a) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
(c) |
|
Equity compensation plans
approved by stockholders |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
1,816,865 |
|
|
$ |
15.74 |
|
|
|
1,375,476 |
|
Equity compensation plans
not approved by
shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,816,865 |
|
|
$ |
15.74 |
|
|
|
1,375,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
See Item 10 above.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
See Item 10 above.
71
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
a) |
|
The following documents are filed as part of this Report: |
|
(1) |
|
Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
Reference is made to the Index to Financial Statements under Item 8 in Part
II hereof, where these documents are listed. |
|
|
(2) |
|
Schedules |
|
|
|
|
Schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required or the
information required to be set forth therein is included in the consolidated
financial statements referenced above in section (a) (1) of this Item 15. |
|
|
(3) |
|
Exhibits |
|
|
|
|
The information on exhibits required by this Item 15 is set forth in the
Eagle Materials Inc. Index to Exhibits appearing on pages 75 - 76 of this
Report. |
72
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
EAGLE MATERIALS INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant |
|
|
|
June 2, 2006
|
|
/s/ STEVEN R. ROWLEY |
|
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Rowley, Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
June 2, 2006
|
|
/s/ STEVEN R. ROWLEY |
|
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Rowley |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
June 2, 2006
|
|
/s/ ARTHUR R. ZUNKER, JR. |
|
|
|
|
|
Arthur R. Zunker, Jr., Senior Vice President |
|
|
Finance and Treasurer |
|
|
(principal financial and accounting officer) |
|
|
|
June 2, 2006
|
|
/s/ F. WILLIAM BARNETT |
|
|
|
|
|
F. William Barnett, Director |
|
|
|
June 2, 2006
|
|
/s/ ROBERT L. CLARKE |
|
|
|
|
|
Robert L. Clarke, Director |
|
|
|
June 2, 2006
|
|
/s/ O. GREG DAGNAN |
|
|
|
|
|
O. Greg Dagnan, Director |
73
|
|
|
June 2, 2006
|
|
/s/ LAURENCE E. HIRSCH |
|
|
|
|
|
Laurence E. Hirsch, Director |
|
|
|
June 2, 2006
|
|
/s/ FRANK W. MARESH |
|
|
|
|
|
Frank W. Maresh, Director |
|
|
|
June 2, 2006
|
|
/s/ MICHAEL R. NICOLAIS |
|
|
|
|
|
Michael R. Nicolais, Director |
|
|
|
June 2, 2006
|
|
/s/ DAVID W. QUINN |
|
|
|
|
|
David W. Quinn, Director |
74
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
EAGLE MATERIALS INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibits |
|
2.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 4, 2003, among
Centex Corporation, Centex Construction Products, Inc. (now known as Eagle Materials Inc.)
and ARG Merger Corporation filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K/A
filed with the Securities Exchange Commission (the Commission) on November 12, 2003 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Distribution Agreement dated as of November 4, 2003 between Centex
Corporation and Centex Construction Products, Inc. (now known as Eagle Materials Inc.) filed
as Exhibit 2.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Commission on
November 12, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report
on Form 8-K for the filed with the Commission on April 11, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws filed as Exhibit B to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A of
the Company filed with the Commission on January 9, 2004 and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 16, 2004 among Eagle Materials
Inc., the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Bank of
America, N.A. and PNC Bank, N.A. as Co-Syndication Agents, and Sun Trust Bank and Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. as Co-Documentation Agents, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 filed with the Commission on February 6, 2006
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Note Purchase Agreement dated as of November 15, 2005, among the Company and the purchasers
named therein filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with
the Commission on November 18, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of April 11, 2006, between Eagle Materials
Inc. and Mellon Investor Services LLC, as Rights Agent, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the
Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A of the Company filed with the
Commission on April 11, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Joint Venture Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 28, 2004, by and between
Eagle ICC LLC, Texas Cement Company and RAAM Limited Partnership filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 29, 2004 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Limited Partnership Agreement of Texas Lehigh Cement Company LP by and between Texas Cement
Company and Lehigh Portland Cement Company effective as of October 1, 2000 filed as Exhibit
10.2 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001
filed with the Commission on June 27, 2001 (the 2001 10-K) and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
10.2(a)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement of Limited Partnership by and among Texas Cement Company,
TLCC LP LLC, TLCC GP LLC, Lehigh Portland Cement Company, Lehigh Portland Investments, LLC
and Lehigh Portland Holdings, LLC effective as of October 2, 2000 filed as Exhibit 10.2(a) to
the 2001 10-K and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
The Eagle Materials Inc. Incentive Plan filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 filed with the Commission on June 10,
2005. (1) |
75
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibits |
|
10.3(a)
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
10.3(b)
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (EBIT) filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 30, 2004 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.3(c)
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (ROE) filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 30, 2004 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.3(d)
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Director Stock Option Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 30, 2004 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.3(e)
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed with the Commission on August
9, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.3(f)
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed with the Commission
on August 9, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
The Eagle Materials Inc. Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan filed
as Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.(1) |
|
|
|
10.4(a)*
|
|
First Amendment to the Eagle Materials Inc. Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan, dated as of May 11, 2004.(1) |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Trademark License and Name Domain Agreement dated January 30, 2004 between the Company and
Centex Corporation filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 filed with the Commission on June 14, 2004 (the 2004 Form
10-K) and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Tax Separation Agreement dated as of April 1, 1994, among Centex, the Company and its
subsidiaries filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the 1995 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Paperboard Supply Agreement, dated May 14, 1998, by and among Republic Paperboard Company
(n/k/a Republic Paperboard Company LLC), Republic Group, Inc., and James Hardie Gypsum, Inc.
filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the 2001 10-K and incorporated herein by reference. Portions of
this Exhibit were omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the
Office of the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each of its directors filed as
Exhibit 10.9 to the 2004 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
21*
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company. |
|
|
|
23.1*
|
|
Consent of Registered Independent Public Accounting Firm Ernst & Young LLP. |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Eagle Materials Inc. pursuant to Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Eagle Materials Inc. pursuant to Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
76
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibits |
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Eagle Materials Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Eagle Materials Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
(1) |
|
Required to be identified as a management contract or a compensatory plan or
arrangement pursuant to Item 14(a)(3) of Form 10-K. |
77
exv10w4xay
Exhibit 10.4(a)
CENTEX CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
First Amendment
WHEREAS, Centex Construction Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company),
established and maintains the Centex Construction Products, Inc. Amended and Restated Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan, amended and restated effective as of November 1, 2000 (the Plan); and
WHEREAS, in connection with the merger of ARG Merger Corporation with and into the Company,
certain amendments were adopted to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company,
including an amendment to change the name of the Company to Eagle Materials Inc., effective as of
January 30, 2004; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Company desires to amend the
Plan to reflect the change in the Companys name;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and covenants therein contained, the Plan is
hereby amended effective, as of January 30, 2004, as follows:
1. The Plan is hereby amended to replace all references to Centex Construction Products, Inc.
Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan with Eagle Materials Inc. Amended and
Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.
2. The Plan is hereby amended to replace the reference to Profit Sharing and Retirement Plan
of Centex Construction Products, Inc. with Profit Sharing and Retirement Plan of Eagle Materials
Inc.
3. The Plan is hereby amended to replace all references to Centex Construction Products,
Inc. with Eagle Materials Inc.
4. The Payout section of the Plan is hereby amended to remove the phrase (including Centex
Corporation and its subsidiaries) from the first paragraph therein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Eagle Materials Inc. has caused these presents to be executed by its duly
authorized officer in a number of copies, all of which shall constitute one and the same
instrument, which may be sufficiently evidenced by an executed copy hereof, this 11th
day of May, 2004, but effective as of January 30, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EAGLE MATERIALS INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Arthur R. Zunker, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Arthur R. Zunker, Jr. |
|
|
Title:
|
|
Sr. V.P. |
-2-
exv21
Exhibit 21
The following is a list of subsidiaries of Eagle Materials Inc., wholly-owned unless
otherwise stated. This list of subsidiaries includes all of the significant subsidiaries of Eagle
Materials Inc. as of May 25, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jurisdiction of |
Entity Name |
|
|
|
|
|
Organization |
AG SOUTH CAROLINA LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMERICAN GYPSUM COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMERICAN GYPSUM MARKETING COMPANY
d/b/a American Gypsum Marketing Company, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCP CEMENT COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCP CONCRETE/AGGREGATES LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCP GYPSUM COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CENTEX MATERIALS LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ILLINOIS CEMENT COMPANY LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MATHEWS READYMIX LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MOUNTAIN CEMENT COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEVADA CEMENT COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPUBLIC PAPERBOARD COMPANY LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEXAS LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY LP
d/b/a Texas Lehigh Cement
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TLCC GP LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TLCC LP LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WESTERN AGGREGATES LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada |
exv23w1
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos.
33-82820, 33-82928, 33-84394, and 333-54102) of Eagle Materials Inc. of our reports dated May 25,
2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Eagle Materials Inc., Eagle
Materials Inc. managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Eagle Materials
Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2006.
Dallas, Texas
May 25, 2006
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
Certification of Periodic Report Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Steven R. Rowley, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Eagle Materials Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures [as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)] and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: June 2, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Steven R. Rowley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Rowley |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
Certification of Periodic Report Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Arthur R. Zunker, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Eagle Materials Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures [as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)] and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Dated:
June 2, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Arthur R. Zunker, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arthur R. Zunker, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
exv32w1
Exhibit 32.1
Certification of Periodic Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Eagle Materials Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven R. Rowley, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
|
(i) |
|
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
Dated:
June 2, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Steven R. Rowley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Rowley |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
exv32w2
Exhibit 32.2
Certification of Periodic Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Eagle Materials Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arthur R. Zunker, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
|
(i) |
|
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
Dated:
June 2, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Arthur R. Zunker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arthur R. Zunker, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|